Appendix B

• Read more about Appendix B

Comparison of Published Statistics with Revenue Scotland’s Annual Report and Financial Statements

The purpose of this appendix is to explain how Revenue Scotland’s monthly LBTT statistics, quarterly SLfT statistics and annual statistics (this publication) relate to the revenue figures that appear in the Devolved Taxes Account in Revenue Scotland’s Annual Report and Financial Statements (referred to in this annex as the ‘Annual Report’), as the figures are produced on a different basis.

Appendix B (i) - comparison of LBTT statistics with published accounts

Whereas the figures in the Annual Report are, by their nature, fixed for a given year (at the point at which the accounts are closed), the published statistics are updated on a monthly basis with changes largely reflecting ADS reclaims (and some other amendments) which have been received after the original LBTT tax returns were submitted.

The Annual Report and published statistics are both based on the date the LBTT return is submitted but with some adjustments made to the Annual Report¹⁹ to accrue revenue for LBTT returns (and claims for repayment of ADS) received in April and May (after the end of the financial year) with an effective date (or sale date for the previous main residence) relating to the previous financial year or earlier. These April/May adjustments typically result in relatively small differences between the Annual Report and published statistics, although the difference was more pronounced in the first year of LBTT (2015/16) because there were no “reverse accruals” relating to the previous year.

Differences in reported figures are mainly due to the different treatments of claims for repayment of ADS in the Annual Report and published statistics. This annex focuses on differences arising due to the different treatments of claims for repayment of ADS and is intended to help the reader make meaningful comparisons between the two sources of financial information.

The published statistics allocate claims for repayment of ADS to the period in which the LBTT return (with ADS declared due) was originally submitted. The accounts published in the Annual Report typically allocate claims for repayment of ADS to the accounting year in which the claim for repayment was received. For example, a claim for repayment of ADS received in June 2019 relating to an LBTT return originally received in March 2019 would be allocated to March 2019 (2018/19) in the published statistics and to 2019/20 in the Annual Report. This repayment could not be allocated to 2018/19 in the accounts because the 2018/19 accounts were closed as at 31 May 2019.

Table 16: LBTT excluding ADS and gross ADS declared due and the value of ADS repayments claimed by year the LBTT return/claim for repayment was received and the year the claim relates to

Notes:

1. For example, a claim for repayment of ADS received in 2017/18 relating to an LBTT return (with ADS declared due) originally received in 2016/17 would relate to 2016/17 (i.e. the year the LBTT return was received) 2. Revenue Scotland Annual Report and Financial Statements. See: https://www.revenue.scot/about-us/publications/corporate-documents 3. All figures are as at the end of the relevant financial year and have not been revised

Key figures in Table 16 that help illustrate the different treatment of claims for repayment of ADS are the £2.0 million and £19.3 million of claims for repayment of ADS received in 2020/21 relating to LBTT returns initially received in 2018/19 and 2019/20, respectively (and to a lesser extent, the £0.1 million relating to 2017/18). In the published statistics, these claims do not result in any adjustment to the net ADS declared due in 2020/21. However, the net ADS reported in the statistics against 2018/19 and 2019/20 is revised (reduced) to reflect these claims as they relate to ADS originally declared on LBTT returns received in those financial years.

In the Annual Report, these repayments are reported as reductions in revenue in 2020/21 as they were received after the accounting periods for 2018/19 and 2019/20 were closed, and hence the accounts for 2018/19 and 2019/20 are not revised. Therefore, to compare the published statistics for LBTT relating to 2020/21 (as at the 31st March 2021 20) with the LBTT revenue reported in Revenue Scotland’s 2020/21 Annual Report (accounts), the ADS repayment claims received during 2020/21 relating to earlier year (£0.1 million for 2017/18, £2.0 million for 2018/19 and £19.3 million for 2019/20) should be deducted from the statistics21.

Table 16 shows that the ‘Devolved Taxes figure for LBTT’ in Revenue Scotland’s accounts and the ‘Net LBTT’ figure taken from the published statistics (adjusted for ADS reclaims in previous years, as discussed above) can broadly be reconciled. There are some other reasons for differences, but these are generally more minor and it is not practical to adjust the statistics for all possible differences.

The most significant of these is the impact of the accounting ‘accruals process’ which attributes revenue in the first 2 months of the accounting year (April and May) to the previous financial year if the ‘effective date’ of the relevant transaction was before 1 April. For every financial year there is revenue coming in from April and May of the following year (accruals) and revenue subtracted (reverse accruals) from April and May of the year in question which was included in the accounts of the previous year.

The accruals and reverse accruals often roughly cancel out, but for 2015/16, 2019/20 and 2020/21 there were more noticeable difference which in turn resulted in more significant differences between ‘Net LBTT’ and ‘Devolved Taxes figure for LBTT’ in Table 16.

For 2015/16, no LBTT revenue where the tax returns were received in April or May 2015 were accrued into 2014/15 in the annual accounts (as LBTT was only introduced in April 2015), but 2015/16 included some revenue for returns received in April and May 2016 with effective dates before 1 April 2016.

For 2019-20, accruals from April and May 2020 (into 2019/20) were reduced as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic which significantly impacted LBTT revenue in late March and April/May 2020. This resulted in a lower figure in the accounts (£597.4 million) than in the net figure shown in Table 16 (£604.2 million), a difference of nearly £7 million.

The opposite effect is seen for 2020/21 where the accrual into the accounts (from April/May 2021 into 2020/21) outweighs the accrual from April/May 2020 into 2019/20. In this case the figure in the accounts for 2020/21 (£517.4 million) is around £7 million more than the net figure in Table 16 (£510.9 million).

Appendix B (ii) – comparison of SLfT statistics with published accounts

Table 17: Comparison of SLfT declared due reported in Revenue Scotland statistics with SLfT revenue reported in the Revenue Scotland Annual Report and Financial Statements

Notes:

1. Revenue Scotland SLfT Official Statistics.

See https://www.revenue.scot/about-us/publications/statistics/scottish-landfill-tax-statistics

2. Revenue Scotland Annual Report and Financial Statements.

See https://www.revenue.scot/about-us/publications/corporate-documents

Table 17 compares the SLfT declared due reported in Revenue Scotland Official Statistics with the SLfT revenue figures reported in Revenue Scotland’s Annual Report.

These statistics are reported in relation to the quarter in which the landfill disposal took place. For example, if a landfill operator submits an SLfT tax return in August 2018 relating to the quarter April - June 2018, the tax declared due is reported against that quarter (i.e. April - June 2018). Landfill operators have 12 months from the “relevant date” to amend their tax return and Revenue Scotland SLfT Statistics are revised up to 12 months after the quarter in question. If additional tax is declared, or identified through Revenue Scotland compliance activities, after this 12 month period, the statistics are not revised. This is to minimise the risk of disclosing Protected Taxpayer Information by updating tonnages and revenues by quarter, potentially showing changes relating only to single operators, or very small numbers of operators.

The Annual Report (accounts) reports revenue against the year in which the revenue was realised, with accrual adjustments in April and May. Unlike the statistics, any additional revenue (or reductions in revenue) realised during a financial year (but potentially relating to earlier years) will be reported as revenue in the accounts during that year and may lead to a difference between SLfT reported in the statistics and the accounts.

¹⁹ The Annual Report and Financial Statements are produced to comply with the accounting principles and disclosure requirements of the Government Financial Reporting Manual.

²⁰ See LBTT, March 2021 https://www.revenue.scot/about-us/publications/statistics/datasets

²¹ Note – the figures of £0.1 million, £2.0 million and £19.3 million for 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20 can be estimated from the statistics by differencing the net ADS statistics published for March 2021 with the net ADS statistics published for March 2020.

Appendix A

• Read more about Appendix A

Date of submission versus effective date

The purpose of this appendix is to explain the basis on which Revenue Scotland’s LBTT statistics are produced, and to demonstrate that data based on the date of submission is similar in value and trend to data on an effective date¹⁸ basis, except at the ends of time series and near policy changes.

Revenue Scotland’s monthly LBTT statistics and the data in this publication are based on the date the LBTT return is submitted. Generally this is different from the effective date as taxpayers have 30 days from the effective date to submit their LBTT return. It can take up to eight weeks from the effective date for the majority (99 per cent) of LBTT returns to be submitted, whereas no such time lag exists for data produced by date of submission. Revenue Scotland is aware of interest in data by effective date but there are good reasons to publish statistics by the date the LBTT return is submitted.

• Publishing data based on the date of submission rather than the effective date allows Revenue Scotland to publish monthly LBTT statistics in a timely manner (within approximately 2-3 weeks of the month end).
• The data will be subject to revision only as a result of changes to the LBTT returns submitted (e.g. a claim for repayment of ADS) and not as a result of the submission of LBTT returns relating to an earlier period (which would be the case for statistics produced by effective date).
• Published statistics include actual values rather than estimates for the most recent months.
• Trends observed in the published data will be broadly the same as those on an effective date basis with the largest deviations occurring at the ends of the series and near policy changes.

Figure 30: Proportion of LBTT returns received by the number of weeks between submission and effective date

Image

Figure 30 shows the proportion of LBTT returns received by the number of weeks between the date of submission and the effective date. The first category (<1 week) represents 0 to 6 days (inclusive), the second category (1-2 weeks) represents 7 to 13 days (inclusive), and so on.

Figure 30 shows that 74 per cent of LBTT returns are submitted within one week of the effective date, 97 per cent are received within four weeks of the effective date and 99 per cent are received within six to eight weeks of the effective date. This data is for LBTT returns (excluding reviews of a lease) received between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2021. This pattern has been very similar from year to year, hence 2020-21 is not shown separately.

If Revenue Scotland was to publish data by effective date, to minimise revisions (due to receipt of LBTT returns relating to property transactions that took place in the specified month), it would seem reasonable that around two months would need to be allowed to pass from the month end before statistics relating to that month could be published. This would ensure that around 99 per cent of LBTT returns with an effective date relating to that month had been received.

For example, Revenue Scotland could be reasonably confident that 99 per cent of LBTT returns with an effective date in March 2021 had been received by 31 May 2021. A small number of LBTT returns with an effective date in March 2021 would be expected to be submitted in June 2021 or later which would result in revisions to the data for March 2021 (if the data was extracted from the tax system and included in a publication by effective date after 31 May 2021).

Figure 31: Number of LBTT returns received by month of submission and effective date

Image

Figure 31 shows the number of LBTT returns (excluding reviews of a lease) received, both by month of submission and by month of effective date. There are some significant differences between the two series for specific months but overall they are similar in terms of value and trend, with no obvious time lag. Where large differences occur, these can in some cases be explained in terms of the introduction of a policy change which relates to specific effective dates.

For example, there are large differences between the two series in March and April 2016. This is likely to have been due to forestalling ahead of the introduction of ADS in April 2016. The number of LBTT returns with an effective date in March 2016 is approximately 2,100 higher than the number of LBTT returns submitted in March 2016, and the number with an effective date in April 2016 is approximately 1,600 lower than the number submitted in April 2016. This reflects the fact that there was a financial incentive for taxpayers to conclude property transactions in March 2016 (before the introduction of ADS). Many transactions were concluded at the very end of that month, with LBTT returns for some of these transactions then being submitted in early April.

In the first month of the series, namely April 2015, the number of returns on an effective date basis is higher than the number of returns based on the date of submission. This reflects the introduction of LBTT in April 2015. There were no LBTT returns submitted in April 2015 with an effective date in March 2015 as these property transactions were subject to UK Stamp Duty Land Tax. However some of the transactions with an effective date in April 2015 will have been submitted the following month, hence reducing the number submitted in April (when compared to those with an effective date in April).

It is worth noting that the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) typically requests data by effective date, which it uses to produce and evaluate forecasts of LBTT revenue. The data provided allows the SFC to more accurately examine the impact of significant events, e.g. policy changes. The data includes LBTT returns with an effective date up to and including the month two months prior to the date on which the data was extracted from the tax system. Revenue Scotland subsequently publishes the data provided to the SFC on the LBTT data requests section of its website.

Land and Buildings Transaction Tax Statistics | Revenue Scotland

¹⁸ Typically the effective date of a land transaction is the date that the land transaction is completed. For further information on the effective date see the guidance published by Revenue Scotland. https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/guidance/lbtt-legislation-guidance/how-taxworks/lbtt1004

Scottish Landfill Tax (SLfT)

• Read more about Scottish Landfill Tax (SLfT)

Scottish Landfill Tax (SLfT) is a tax on the disposal of waste to a landfill in Scotland, whether or not to an authorised landfill site. SLfT applies to all taxable disposals made in Scotland on or after 1 April 2015.

SLfT also applies to the prescribed landfill activities relating to the use of material on site that are listed in the Scottish Landfill Tax (Prescribed Landfill Site Activities) Order 2014.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2014/367/made

For more information about SLfT, please see the relevant sections on our website.

https://www.revenue.scot/scottish-landfill-tax

The current rates for SLfT are set by the Scottish Government and approved by the Scottish Parliament.

https://www.revenue.scot/scottish-landfill-tax/guidance/slft-legislationguidance/determining-tax/slft2002

Table 12: Declared taxable disposals by SLfT rate and year

Standard rate disposals of 1.17 million tonnes were declared in 2020/21, a decrease of 13 per cent on the previous year, and a continuation of the long-term trend of gradually declining disposals.

During April to June 2020, standard rate disposals were 41 per cent lower than the same period of the 2019, significantly faster than the long-term trend of reducing tonnages, due to disruption resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions. However, higher disposals in the following three quarters of the year compensated to some extent for this decrease.

Lower rate disposals of 0.62 million tonnes were declared in 2020/21. Since 2015/16 lower rate disposals have decreased by approximately 0.43 million tonnes (41 per cent). Much of this decrease in lower rate disposals occurred between 2015/16 and 2016/17, following the cessation of taxable activity by a small number of operators.

Table 13: SLfT declared due, contributions to the Scottish Landfill Communities Fund (SLCF) and credits claimed by year

Notes:

1. For 2015/16 and 2016/17 this column will not equal the sum of the previous two columns. This is because of a small number of operators who have not reported the tonnages associated with taxable disposals subject to a partial water discount. The disposals were included in the gross SLfT declared due and, therefore, do not have any tax implications.

2. Taxpayers can claim a credit equal to 90 percent of their contribution to the SLCF.

3. Credit claimed for bad debt and permanent removals

The net SLfT declared due is mainly dependent on standard rate disposals, lower rate disposals and contributions to the SLCF¹⁶ . The rates at which standard and lower rate disposals are taxed are set by the Scottish Government and vary each year. For further information on SLfT rates see the guidance published by Revenue Scotland.¹⁷

Since 2015/16 the tax rate for standard rate disposals has been around 32 times higher than that for lower rate disposals. Gross SLfT liabilities are therefore dominated by standard rate disposals.

Net SLfT declared due was £106 million in 2020/21, a decrease of £12 million (10 per cent) on the previous year. Similar to standard rate disposal tonnages, the largest decrease in revenue (and contributions to the SLCF) occurred between 2018/19 and 2019/20. The longterm decrease in net SLfT is predominantly due to standard rate disposal tonnages decreasing faster than the standard rate of tax has increased with inflation.

Figure 27: Declared standard rate disposals by quarter

Image

Figure 28: SLfT declared due by quarter

Image

Figure 27 shows declared standard rate disposal tonnages by quarter and year and Figure 28 shows the (net) SLfT declared due by quarter and year. Figure 27 shows that the standard rate disposal tonnages declared in April to June and July to September tend to be slightly higher than in October to December and January to March. April to June 2020 provided an exception to this trend as waste disposals were disrupted by impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Figure 29: Declared taxable disposals by SLfT rate and quarter

Image

Figure 29 shows declared taxable disposals by SLfT rate and quarter. In addition to the seasonality discussed above, Figure 29 shows a gradual downward trend in standard and lower rate disposals up to and including 2018/19-Q2, followed by a more marked decrease in the level of standard rate disposals from 2018/19-Q3 onwards. A clear dip is seen in Q1 2020/21 and this is likely to reflect the impact of COVID restrictions.

Revenue Scotland collects information on the types of waste constituting the taxable disposals in the supplementary spreadsheets submitted with SLfT returns. The waste is categorised using European Waste Catalogue (EWC) codes. For further information on EWC codes see the guidance published by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency.

https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/163421/ewc_guidance.pdf

Table 14: Proportion of gross SLfT declared due by EWC code and year

Mixed municipal waste (EWC code 20 03 01) is consistently the most prevalent waste type, contributing around 63 per cent of SLfT revenue from 2015/16 to 2017/18, falling to around 49 per cent in 2019/20 to 2020/21. A further 23 to 35 per cent of the gross SLfT due is attributable to disposals of EWC code 19 12 12 – other wastes (including mixtures of materials) from mechanical treatment of wastes other than those mentioned in 19 12 11. Disposals of these two waste streams have accounted for the majority (82 to 88 per cent) of gross SLfT declared due each year.

Note that as EWC code 19 12 12 constitutes waste “from the mechanical treatment of waste” then it will contain other waste types (i.e. other EWC codes) that have then been mechanically treated.

Table 15: Taxable disposals by EWC code and SLfT rate, 2015/16 – 2020/21

Mixed municipal waste (EWC code 20 03 01) has accounted for 5.9 million tonnes of taxable disposals over the first six years of SLfT, all of which was declared as subject to the standard rate of SLfT. EWC code 19 12 12 has accounted for 3.7 million tonnes over six years. Taxable disposals of EWC code 19 12 12 are split between the standard and lower rates of SLfT. Table 15 shows that 69 per cent of disposals of EWC code 19 12 12 where tax was declared due have been declared as subject to the standard rate of SLfT and the remaining 31 per cent have been declared as subject to the lower rate.

Further information on determining the amount of SLfT tax payable (e.g. higher or lower rate) is contained in guidance published by Revenue Scotland.

https://www.revenue.scot/scottish-landfill-tax/guidance/slft-legislation-guidance/determining-tax/slft2002

¹⁶ Taxpayers can claim a credit of 90 per cent of their contribution to the SLCF which is then deducted from their gross SLfT liability.

¹⁷ https://www.revenue.scot/scottish-landfill-tax/guidance/slft-legislation-guidance/determining-tax/slft2002

Land and Buildings Transaction Tax

• Read more about Land and Buildings Transaction Tax

Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) came into effect on 1 April 2015. It is a replacement for the UK Stamp Duty and Land Tax (SDLT) which ceased to apply in Scotland on the same date. LBTT is administered by Revenue Scotland.

LBTT is a charge on land transactions in Scotland. Land transactions must be notified to Revenue Scotland unless the chargeable consideration is less than £40,000 or the transaction is otherwise exempt (such as acquisitions by the Crown or transactions in connection with a court order relating to divorce or dissolution of civil partnership). A full list of exempt transactions can be found in the LBTT guidance.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/guidance/lbtt-legislation-guidance/exemptions-reliefs/lbtt3002

For more information about LBTT, please see the relevant sections on our website.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax

The Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) was introduced on 1 April 2016. ADS is an additional charge which is applicable when the taxpayer is not replacing their main residence. The most common scenario in which taxpayers are likely to pay ADS is where they are purchasing an additional property – for example, a buy-to-let dwelling or a second home (or holiday home) – in addition to their main residence.

In cases where, for example, a taxpayer buys a new main residence before selling their previous main residence, the taxpayer initially pays ADS but then has 18 months⁴ from the effective date of the original transaction to sell their previous main residence and reclaim the ADS.

For more information about ADS, please see the relevant sections on our website.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/guidance/lbtt-legislation-guidance/lbtt10001-lbtt-additional-dwelling

Throughout this publication ‘gross ADS’ refers to the ADS declared due and ‘net ADS’ refers to the ADS declared due minus any repayments of ADS claimed.

The current rates for LBTT (and ADS) are set by the Scottish Government and approved by the Scottish Parliament.

In May 2020, the Scottish Parliament approved a temporary change to LBTT rates, having the effect of raising the nil rate tax threshold from £145,000 to £250,000 for all residential conveyance transactions, effective from 15 July 2020 to 31 March 2021.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/guidance/calculating-tax-rates-and-bands

The LBTT legislation requires three-yearly reviews of lease transactions in order to assess any changes in the LBTT due through, for example, rent reviews and extensions. The first three-yearly reviews of lease transactions were received from 1 April 2018. Unless the lease has been terminated or assigned, a further LBTT return must be submitted by the tenant at every third anniversary of the effective date of the lease (i.e. year 3, year 6, year 9 etc.) and any additional LBTT paid or overpaid LBTT reclaimed.

For more information on three-yearly reviews of lease transactions please see the relevant sections on our website.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/guidance/lbtt-legislation-guidance/leases/lbtt6014

Where a lease has been notified to Revenue Scotland and is later assigned to a new tenant, the assignor (the outgoing tenant) must make a further LBTT return to Revenue Scotland within 30 days of the day after the lease was assigned. Where a lease has been notified to Revenue Scotland and is later terminated for any reason (including a renunciation of the lease), the tenant at the point of termination must make a further LBTT return to Revenue Scotland within 30 days of the day after the lease is terminated. Assignations and terminations were received prior to 1 April 2018 but they were not distinguished in the statistics from lease transactions prior to this date.

For more information on assignations and terminations, please see the relevant sections on our website.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/guidance/lbtt-legislation-guidance/leases/lbtt6017

Throughout this publication ‘reviews of a lease’ refers to three-yearly reviews, assignations and terminations. LBTT from reviews of a lease is the additional LBTT declared due minus any repayments claimed. This net figure may be positive or negative.

2.1 Overview

Figure 1: LBTT declared due by transaction and year

Image

Every year so far, residential conveyances have accounted for more LBTT than each of the other transaction types: non-residential conveyances, leases and reviews of a lease. Prior to the introduction of the Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) on 1 April 2016, residential and non-residential conveyances accounted for similar amounts of LBTT. ADS almost exclusively affects residential transactions, although a small number of non-residential conveyances with a residential component pay ADS. Since the introduction of ADS, residential conveyances have accounted for approximately twice to three times the revenue of non-residential conveyances. This reflects the introduction of ADS, and an increase in LBTT excluding ADS from residential conveyances (e.g. due to house price increases), while LBTT revenue from non-residential conveyances has remained relatively flat. Leases account for much less LBTT than residential and non-residential conveyances.

Since 2016/17, residential conveyances have accounted for 66 per cent of LBTT, non-residential conveyances have accounted for 30 per cent of LBTT and leases have accounted for 4 per cent of LBTT. Reviews of a lease have accounted for less than 0.1 per cent of LBTT since taking effect in 2018.

In total, LBTT (as at 31 May 2021) has increased from £416 million for tax returns originally received in 2015/16 to £601 million in 2019/20, decreasing to £526 million in 2020/21.

During 2020/21, both the number of LBTT returns received and the value of tax declared were significantly disrupted by impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. From April to June 2020, residential property transactions were limited by restrictions on viewings and restrictions on house moves; both residential and non-residential conveyances were affected by restrictions on registering a title; and all types of conveyance and lease transactions were potentially affected by general economic uncertainty at the start of the pandemic. From April to June 2020, 62% fewer LBTT returns were received than the same period of 2019.

House move restrictions were lifted on 29 June and, in addition, the Scottish Parliament approved a temporary change to rates of LBTT on residential transactions, effective from 15 July 2020 to 31 March 2021, raising the taxable threshold (nil rate band) to £250,000. The number of LBTT returns recovered substantially from August 2020 to March 2021, and by the end of the year the number of LBTT returns received during 2020/21 was only 10 per cent lower than that for 2019/20. The overall 17 per cent decrease in total LBTT declared due (excluding ADS) from 2019/20 to 2020/21 reflects the fact that fewer transactions took place during the year, and that less tax was due for the majority of residential transactions during the year due to the temporary change to the tax bands, offset to some extent by a clear increase in average house prices from around September 2020 onwards⁵ . The recovery in non-residential LBTT revenues (including leases) was not as marked as that for residential revenues, with an overall drop of 26% in non-residential LBTT revenue from 2019/20 to 2020/21.

The relationship between revenue figures in this publication and those published in Revenue Scotland’s Annual Report and Financial Statements is described in Appendix B.

Table 1: Number of LBTT returns received by type of transaction and year

The number of LBTT returns received by type of transaction is more consistent over time than the corresponding LBTT declared due. Residential conveyances have accounted for the majority (88 per cent) of LBTT returns received since 2015. Non-residential conveyances have accounted for 6 per cent of LBTT returns received with leases accounting for around 4 per cent. Reviews of a lease have accounted for 3 per cent of returns in the three years since taking effect in 2018/19.

It is worth noting that non-residential conveyances account for a much higher proportion of LBTT declared due (30 per cent since 2016/17) than LBTT returns received (6 per cent). This is because small numbers of high-value non-residential conveyances typically account for a relatively large proportion of LBTT. By contrast, reviews of a lease account for a much higher proportion of LBTT returns received (3 per cent since April 2018) than LBTT declared due (less than 0.1 per cent).

2.2 Residential LBTT excluding ADS

In this section we summarise the trends in LBTT excluding Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) declared due for residential conveyances and the number of residential conveyance returns received. There are good reasons for presenting analysis of LBTT excluding ADS separately from analysis of ADS. Analysing trends in total LBTT declared due for residential conveyances is complicated by the introduction of the ADS on 1 April 2016 which introduces a break in the LBTT revenue time series. Furthermore, as the ADS may be reclaimed when the taxpayer sells their previous main residence, the series is subject to large downward revisions for many months. This is less problematic for non-residential conveyances as net ADS revenue accounts for a very small proportion of LBTT revenue from non-residential conveyances (due to the few non-residential transactions with a residential component subject to ADS) (See Figure 1).

Table 2: LBTT excluding ADS declared due and number of LBTT returns received by year for residential conveyances

* Rounded to the nearest £100

Revenue excluding ADS from residential conveyances increased each year to 2019/20, from £202 million in 2015/16 to £287 million in 2019/20, before decreasing to £257 million in 2020/21. Meanwhile the number of returns received remained relatively stable until 2019/20, before dropping slightly to 97,000 in 2020/21. This 8 per cent decrease in number of returns received from 2019/20 to 2020/21 masks a much sharper drop in the first quarter of 2020/21, followed by recovery in the later part of the year, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Number of residential conveyance returns received by month

Image

 Figure 3: LBTT excluding ADS declared due for residential conveyances received by month

Image

 Both the number of residential LBTT returns and the revenue excluding ADS show consistent seasonal, monthly, and weekly patterns. Fewer returns are received in January and February (6,100 per month on average compared to 9,100 on average for other months), and these months are also associated with lower average house prices⁶ (e.g. due to a higher proportion of lower value properties sold at this time of year). More returns are received on Fridays than other weekdays (570 compared to 350 per day), and the last Friday of each month typically sees the highest residential returns (590 per day). After accounting for the known seasonal and calendar effects, the number of residential LBTT returns received remained relatively constant from 2015/16 to 2019/20, with some variation from month to month remaining unexplained by these factors. LBTT revenues excluding ADS from residential returns increased over the same period, from around £15 million per month in 2015 to around £24 million in early 2020, consistent with year on year increases in average property values.

From March 2020 onwards, the seasonal pattern of property transactions was significantly disrupted by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including restrictions on house moves from late March to late June 2020, and subsequent recovery and release of "pent-up demand". After accounting for the pre-COVID-19 seasonal cycle and calendar effects, residential LBTT transactions and revenue were substantially suppressed from April to August 2020 before rapidly recovering and reaching unusually high levels in December 2020 and March 2021.

During March 2016, seasonally adjusted residential LBTT return volumes and revenue excluding ADS were higher than otherwise expected, as some buyers rushed to complete transactions before the introduction of ADS on 1 April 2016. A similar effect may have contributed to the unseasonally high numbers of returns in March 2021, ahead of the nil rate band threshold reverting back to £145,000 from its temporary level of £250,000 (from 15 July 2020 to 31 March 2021). For more information on numbers of returns and revenue after March 2021, see the most recent monthly LBTT statistics publication.

Figure 4: Distribution of residential conveyance returns received by residential LBTT band and year

Image

Figure 5: Distribution of LBTT excluding ADS by residential LBTT band and year for residential conveyances

Image

41 per cent of returns received in 2020/21 had total consideration less than or equal to £145,000 and, therefore, had zero tax liabilities⁷ regardless of the temporary nil rate band threshold increase. LBTT revenue is dominated by the £325,000 to £750,000 band, which in 2020/21 contributed 64 per cent of LBTT while making up only 12 per cent of returns. The highest band (£750,001 and above) accounts for less than one per cent of returns received and 26 per cent of tax.

Figure 4 shows that there has been an upward shift in the distribution of residential conveyances in each year, i.e. a decreasing proportion of returns in the £0 to £145,000 band each year and increasing proportions of returns received in all higher bands, becoming steeper in 2020/21. This is consistent with the increase in average residential property prices reported by Registers of Scotland year on year from 2016/17 to 2019/20, and a sharper increase in average residential property prices following the initial disruption of COVID-19 in 2020/21.

The share of revenue (Figure 5) contributed by the top two tax bands increased in 2020/21 due to the temporary change to the nil rate threshold, effective from 15 June 2020 to 31 March 2021, which had the effect of reducing tax liabilities in the second-lowest residential tax band (consideration from £145,000 to £250,000) to zero, and reducing gross tax liabilities for all other residential transactions by £2,100.

Figure 6: Average (mean) LBTT excluding ADS declared due for residential conveyances by residential LBTT band and month, 2019/20 and 2020/21

Image

Figure 6 illustrates the effect of the temporary tax band change on average LBTT declared due within each tax band. The impact of the £2,100 reduction in LBTT due for transactions over £250,000, effective from 15 June 2020, is clearly visible in the two tax bands from £250,000 to £750,000. Average LBTT declared due for transactions above £750,000 is more volatile due to being dominated by a small number of large transactions which vary significantly in value.

Due to the structure of the tax, a small shift in residential property prices typically results in a larger change in tax revenues.

Figure 7: Distribution of numbers of residential conveyance transactions by total consideration, 2020-21

Image

Figure 7 shows a more detailed breakdown of the number of residential conveyance transactions by total consideration (e.g. house price) for transactions that took place in 2020-21. The majority of transactions are towards the lower end of the scale (approximately two-thirds are less than or equal to £220k), with the distribution then extending to a long tail of higher value transactions. Due to the smaller numbers of transactions at the higher value end, the width of the total consideration categories is increased at the points indicated on the chart. Price point effects are visible around £100,000, £200,000, £250,000 and £300,000, reflecting a preference for round number values. 

2.3 Additional Dwelling Supplement

Table 3: Gross ADS declared due, number of LBTT returns received with ADS declared due and value and number of repayments claimed by year for residential conveyances

Notes: 1. The data reflects claims for repayment of ADS received up to and including 31 May 2021 and will be revised over time as more claims for repayment of ADS are received, primarily for returns received in 2019/20 and 2020/21. In May 2020, the period for reclaiming ADS was extended for buyers who bought a new main residence effective between 24 September 2018 and 25 March 2020. ADS reclaims relating to transactions in 2018/19 and 2019/20 can therefore be expected continue into 2021/22.

Approximately £154 million in gross ADS was declared due in 2020/21, a decrease of approximately £10 million (6 per cent) on the previous year. The sharp (28 per cent) increase in ADS declared due from 2018/19 to 2019/20 was due largely to the increase in the ADS rate from 3 per cent to 4 per cent effective from 25 January 2019.

Approximately 20,800 residential LBTT returns received in 2020/21 had ADS declared due, equating to 21 per cent of all residential conveyances received, a similar proportion to previous years (22 per cent in 2019/20).

Approximately 12 per cent of taxpayers who submitted LBTT returns with ADS declared due in 2020/21 have since claimed repayment of ADS, accounting for 19 per cent of the gross ADS declared due. The ADS reclaim rate for 2020/21 appears lower than previous years. However, this figure will continue to increase over time as more claims for repayment are made. Only minimal revisions are expected to repayment claims relating to returns made up to 2018/19. Of these, approximately 18 per cent of ADS returns have since been reclaimed, accounting for 27 per cent of the gross ADS declared due. This indicates that claims are more likely to relate to higher value transactions.

During the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, legislation was introduced to extend the ADS repayment claim period for residential transactions which were still within their original ADS repayment claim period at the start of the restrictions, from 18 months to 36 months. This means that some returns relating to 2018/19 and 2019/20 may still be eligible for ADS repayment claims in 2021/22 and 2022/23. However, the majority of repayment claims are still expected to be made within one year.

Figure 8: Proportion of gross ADS declared due subsequently reclaimed and LBTT returns received with ADS declared due and a subsequent claim for repayment, by month for residential conveyances

Image

Figure 8 shows the proportion of gross ADS declared due that was subsequently reclaimed and the proportion of LBTT returns received with ADS declared due and a subsequent claim for repayment, by month of the original return, for residential conveyances. The gross ADS reclaimed rises from 7 per cent for the most recent month (7 per cent of ADS declared due in March 2021 was reclaimed by end May 2021) to around 27 per cent for the first 44 months (April 2016 to November 2019). This is a reflection of the fact that ADS taxpayers from earlier months have had 18 months from the effective date⁸ of the transaction subject to ADS to sell their previous main residence and then reclaim ADS. Similarly, the number of claims for repayment of ADS rises from 5 per cent for the most recent month (March 2021) to around 18 per cent for the first 44 months (April 2016 to November 2019).

Though taxpayers have 18 months from the effective date of the transaction subject to ADS to sell their previous main residence and reclaim ADS, it should be noted that the majority of claims for repayment of ADS are received well within this 18 month period.

Figure 9: Proportion of ADS reclaimed and reclaims received by the number of weeks between submission of the LBTT return and the claim for repayment, for returns with ADS declared due submitted 2016/17 to 2020/21

Image

Figure 9 shows the proportion of gross ADS (tax) reclaimed and the proportion of claims (transactions) received by the number of weeks between the claim for repayment and original submission of the LBTT return. Approximately 8 per cent of claims are received within four weeks, over half of all claims are received within 20 weeks and approximately 85 per cent of all claims are received within a year. There is no obvious distinction between the distributions for claims received and gross ADS reclaimed. This suggests that claims for repayment associated with higher value transactions are no more likely to be received earlier (or later) than those for lower value transactions.

The LBTT return asks taxpayers declaring ADS due about their intention to reclaim ADS, i.e. do they intend to reclaim the ADS or not.

Table 4: Number of LBTT returns received with ADS declared due and the proportion with a subsequent claim for repayment by year, by the taxpayer’s stated intention to reclaim ADS for residential conveyances

Notes: 1. The data reflects claims for repayment of ADS received up to and including 31 May 2021 and will be revised over time as more claims for repayment of ADS are received, primarily for returns received in 2019/20 and 2020/21. In May 2020, the period for reclaiming ADS was extended for buyers who bought a new main residence effective between 24 September 2018 and 25 March 2020. Revisions relating to 2018/19 and 2019/20 can be expected in 2021/22.

For LBTT returns submitted with ADS declared due in 2019/20 around 70 per cent of taxpayers who stated that they intended to reclaim ADS subsequently went on to do so, slightly higher than previous years (around 65 per cent). Up to 2018/19, less than 2 per cent of taxpayers who stated they did not intend to reclaim ADS subsequently went on to do so; in 2019/20 this figure increased to 4.5 per cent and in 2020/21 it remained elevated at 3.2 per cent.

These figures indicate that a substantial proportion (around 30 per cent at its lowest in 2019/20) of taxpayers who stated that they intended to reclaim ADS did not subsequently do so. However, when a taxpayer had stated that they did not intend to reclaim ADS then it was unlikely that they subsequently submitted a claim for repayment.

Figure 10: Distribution of residential conveyances by type of transaction (ADS declared due and intends/does not intend to reclaim ADS, or no ADS declared due) and residential LBTT band, 2016/17 to 2020/21

Image

Figure 10 shows the distribution of residential conveyances by tax band and whether the taxpayer intended to reclaim any ADS declared due. There is a clear divergence between the distributions. Residential conveyances with ADS declared due where the taxpayer does not intend to reclaim ADS are more likely to be lower value transactions. This is likely to reflect the fact that these transactions will include buy-to-let properties and second homes. Residential conveyances with ADS declared due where the taxpayer intends to reclaim ADS tend to be higher value transactions. This is likely to reflect a number of factors including the fact that these transactions will include taxpayers who may be moving up the property ladder (as they intend to replace their previous main residence).

2.4 Non-residential conveyances

In this section we summarise the trends in LBTT declared due for non-residential conveyances and the number of non-residential conveyances received. Non-residential transactions also include leases and reviews of a lease, which are analysed separately in sections 2.5 and 2.6 respectively.

Table 5: LBTT declared due and number of LBTT returns received by year for non-residential conveyance

Notes: 1. Rounded to the nearest £100.

Table 5 shows the LBTT declared due (including ADS) and number of LBTT returns received by year for non-residential conveyances. Although only making up 5 per cent of LBTT returns received, non-residential conveyances have accounted for approximately 27 per cent of LBTT declared due in the last two years (including ADS).

LBTT from non-residential conveyances was £126 million in 2020/21, a decrease of £47 million (27 per cent) compared to the previous year despite the number of LBTT returns received decreasing by only 8 per cent. This is the lowest annual figure since LBTT was introduced in 2015/16 and reflected, in particular, very low revenue at the start of the financial year when COVID stay-at-home measures were introduced.

Compared to residential LBTT, the value of LBTT from non-residential conveyances is highly volatile due to fluctuations in the small number of very high value transactions seen in each year.

Figure 11: LBTT declared due by month and year for non-residential conveyances

Image

 Figure 12: Number of non-residential conveyance returns received by month and year

Image

In typical years, the number of non-residential conveyances received is relatively stable, with moderate peaks in November and December and March and April (perhaps linked to the ends of the calendar and financial years) and a slightly quieter period in January and February. This pattern was disrupted from March 2020 by the impact of the COVID-19 and the impact on businesses across Scotland. As a result, numbers of non-residential conveyances reached an all-time low of 260 in April 2020. This figure made a gradual recovery up to August 2020 and remained in line with previous years until jumping to a record high in March 2021.

LBTT declared due for non-residential conveyances is more variable than the number of LBTT returns received because a small number of high-value transactions can have a significant impact on the overall tax. However the period of March to June 2020 is visibly suppressed compared to previous years.

Figure 13: LBTT declared due by vigintile and year for non-residential conveyances

Image

Figure 13 shows LBTT declared due by vigintile⁹ and year for non-residential conveyances. Each year the first vigintile accounts for approximately 71 to 75 per cent of LBTT declared due. In each year the top 20 per cent of transactions have accounted for over 95 per cent of LBTT declared due.

There are large annual variations in the value of LBTT declared due for the top 5 per cent of transactions and these variations account for the majority of the change in LBTT declared due. This has been particularly pronounced in 2020/21, with LBTT declared due for the top 5 per cent of transactions decreasing by £37 million (29 per cent) compared to the previous year. 

2.5 Leases

In this section we summarise the trends in LBTT declared due for leases and the number of leases received. The vast majority (99 per cent) of leases are non-residential, but users should note that the analysis in this section includes a small number of leases which taxpayers have classified as residential on their tax returns. This may be a data quality issue as we would only expect a very small number of leases (close to zero) subject to LBTT to be classified for LBTT purposes as residential. Regardless, the overall tax position remains correct as the LBTT due for a lease transaction is the same whether it is a non-residential or residential lease.

For more information about leases, please see the relevant sections on our website.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/leases

Table 6: LBTT declared due and number of LBTT returns received by year for leases

Notes: 1. Rounded to the nearest £100.

Leases have accounted for approximately 4 per cent of LBTT declared due and LBTT returns received during the first six years of LBTT.

£19 million in LBTT was declared due for leases in 2020 – the lowest so far and a decrease of £2 million (9 per cent) from 2019/20, while the number of lease returns received decreased by 29 per cent. Although there is historically high variation in LBTT from leases, the significant drop in 2020/21 is likely to reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Figure 14: LBTT declared due by month and year for leases

Image

 Figure 15: Number of lease returns received by month and year

Image

 Similarly to non-residential conveyances, the number of lease returns received tends to be highest in November and March/April, perhaps linked to the ends of the calendar and financial years. Unlike conveyances, of which generally fewer returns are received in January and February, there is no obvious low season for leases. Throughout 2020/21, numbers of lease returns have been noticeably lower than in the same months of previous years, with the exception of March 2020, when the COVID-19 related reduction in transactions was already becoming apparent.

LBTT declared due for leases shows similar high variability to non-residential conveyances and a small number of high value transactions can have a significant impact on the overall tax.

Figure 16: LBTT declared due by vigintile and year for leases

Image

Each year from 2015/16 to 2018/19, the top five per cent of lease transactions accounted for approximately 70 to 74 per cent of LBTT declared due for leases, falling to 63 per cent in 2019/20. In 2020/21, revenue collected from the bottom 95 per cent of leases decreased, and the top five per cent of leases once more made up 70 per cent of all LBTT on leases.

LBTT may be due on a lease in relation to the net present value of rent, and/or on other chargeable considerations, such as payment of a premium to secure the lease. From 2015/16 to 2020/21, an estimated 84 per cent of all LBTT declared due on leases was due to rent, with the remaining 16 per cent due to premiums. LBTT due on premiums is dominated by a small number of large premiums over £350,000. Less than 1 per cent of leases fall into this top band of tax on premiums, contributing 94 per cent of all LBTT declared due on premiums. LBTT due on the rental value of leases is more widespread; 52 per cent of leases declared some amount of LBTT due on rent, increasing steadily from 45 per cent of notifiable leases in 2015/16 to 59 per cent in 2020/21.

Table 7: LBTT declared due for leases by taxable component

Notes:

1 The value of LBTT declared due on rent or on premiums is scaled to sum to the total LBTT declared due after reliefs, while preserving the ratio of LBTT declared due on rent to LBTT declared due on premium within each individual return. 2 Count of all lease returns declaring a non-zero amount of LBTT due on net present value of rent, after scaling to match the total LBTT declared due after reliefs. 3 Count of all lease returns declaring a non-zero amount of LBTT due on a premium declared greater than £350,000, after adjusting the LBTT declared due on a premium to match the total LBTT declared due after reliefs. 4 This table has been produced for the first time in the 2020/21 publication based on data as at May 2021. Totals for earlier years may not exactly match other figures in this publication which have been fixed after 24 months.

2.6 Reviews of a lease

In this section we summarise the trends in LBTT declared due for reviews of a lease (threeyearly reviews, assignations and terminations) and the number of reviews of a lease received from 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2021. The first three-yearly reviews of lease transactions became due from 1 April 2018. Assignations and terminations were received prior to 1 April 2018 but were not distinguished from lease transactions prior to this date. The first six-year reviews of lease transactions became due from 1 April 2021; these figures for three-yearly lease reviews include some reviews submitted early for six-year reviews due after 31 March 2021.

Table 8: LBTT declared due and number of returns received for reviews of a lease by type of review and the amount due

Table 8 shows the LBTT declared due for reviews of a lease by type of review and the amount due. Where a review return declares a decrease from the amount due for the original lease return, this reflects a claim for repayment. Three-yearly lease reviews resulted in net LBTT declared due of £0.3 million in 2020/21. This consisted of £0.5 million in further LBTT due and £0.2 million of repayments claimed. Lease assignations resulted in a further net LBTT declared due of £0.2 million. Three-yearly lease reviews and assignations were balanced out by lease terminations which resulted in a net repayment of £0.5 million, bringing the overall net LBTT declared due for all reviews of a lease to approximately nil.

Approximately 2,900 reviews of a lease were received in 2020/21, of which 73 per cent declared no change in the LBTT due from the original lease return (i.e. the LBTT declared due on review was £0), 15 per cent declared further LBTT due and 11 per cent claimed a repayment of LBTT. Three-yearly lease reviews accounted for 78 per cent of reviews of a lease received, with terminations and assignations accounting for 11 per cent each. The total number of lease reviews received was 37 per cent lower than the previous year, driven primarily by a 41 per cent drop in the number of three-yearly lease reviews.

2.7 Sub-Scotland

Revenue Scotland does not routinely (i.e. as part of its monthly LBTT Official Statistics publications) publish information on LBTT for geographies smaller than the whole of Scotland. However, we are aware of the wide interest in this data and are committed to publishing annual information on LBTT revenue declared due and returns received by Sub-Scotland geographies in this annual publication.

Whilst data at the national level is finalised after 24 months, data for smaller areas is finalised after 12 months. This decision has been taken as a result of the risk of disclosing protected taxpayer information relating to individual people or businesses.

As noted in previous editions of this publication, the sub-Scotland data has historically presented challenges as a result of the incompleteness and inaccuracies in address information on tax returns. Following the introduction of the new Scottish Electronic Tax System in July 2019, there was a marked increase in the improvement of address data in the second half of 2019/20. This improvement in data quality has been sustained, with 98 per cent of residential conveyance returns and 67 per cent of non-residential conveyance returns received in 2020/21 having a valid postcode.

In order to provide estimates of LBTT revenue declared due and returns received by sub-Scotland geographies, Revenue Scotland has adopted the following method to determine a valid postcode for a return.

• If a valid property postcode is provided on the tax return, this postcode is used.
• If no valid postcode is provided, where possible the return is linked to data provided by Registers of Scotland and geographical information associated with the title registration is used.
• If neither of the above are possible then the geographical information is imputed by finding a suitable “donor” record for which a valid property postcode is available. The “donor” record is chosen based on similarity to the "recipient" record with respect to other information on the tax return.

This method provides robust estimates for residential and non-residential conveyances. The estimates for residential conveyances are more reliable because residential conveyance returns are more likely to include a valid postcode and more likely to match to a title registered with Registers of Scotland. For the estimates presented here of returns submitted in 2020/21, location was imputed for less than 1 per cent of residential returns and 12 per cent of non-residential returns.

The method described above is not effective for leases as we do not have an alternative source to match these transactions to. Therefore, sub-Scotland estimates are only provided for residential and non-residential conveyances.

Full details of the method used to produce the estimates can be found on the LBTT data requests section¹⁰ of the Revenue Scotland website.

Revenue Scotland would like to thank Registers of Scotland for the support provided for this work. Users should again note that these estimates are not a commentary on the volume or value of land and property transactions in Scotland. Registers of Scotland publish comprehensive property data for Scotland and is the definitive source of data on the property market.

https://www.ros.gov.uk/data-and-statistics

2.7.1 Sub-Scotland: Residential LBTT

Figure 17: Estimates of LBTT excluding ADS declared due for residential conveyances by local authority and year

Image

In 2020/21, City of Edinburgh accounted for £86 million (33 per cent) of LBTT excluding ADS declared due, more than four times greater than any other local authority. Glasgow City accounted for £20 million (8 per cent), the second highest of all local authorities. City of Edinburgh has accounted for 30 to 34 per cent of LBTT revenue excluding in each of the last six years. No other local authority has ever accounted for more than 9 per cent.

From 2019/20 to 2020/21, LBTT revenues decreased across 21 of the 32 authorities with the largest absolute drop in City of Edinburgh, where £12 million less LBTT was declared than the previous financial year. The greatest absolute increase in 2020/21 was recorded in Perth and Kinross, where LBTT revenue increased by £2 million (24 per cent) from 2019/20.

Figure 18: Estimated number of residential conveyance returns received by local authority and year

Image

 Glasgow City accounted for most residential conveyance returns received in 2020/21 with 10,800 returns (11 per cent of the Scotland total), marginally ahead of City of Edinburgh with 10,400 returns (11 per cent).

Numbers of residential conveyances decreased across 26 of the 32 local authorities from 2019/20 to 2020/21, with City of Edinburgh showing the largest absolute drop of 1,400 fewer conveyances than the previous year. Where more returns were received than the previous year this was a marginal increase, never more than around 1 per cent of the number of returns received in 2019/20.

2.7.2 Sub-Scotland: Additional Dwelling Supplement

Figure 19: Estimates of gross ADS declared due for residential conveyances by local authority, intention to reclaim ADS and year

Image

Sub-Scotland: Additional Dwelling Supplement

Figure 19 shows estimates of gross ADS declared due for residential conveyances, and intention not to reclaim ADS, by local authority and year. City of Edinburgh accounted for most gross ADS declared due in 2019/20 with £32 million, 21 per cent of the Scotland total, but a £6 million (17 per cent) decrease on the previous year. Glasgow City accounted for the second-largest share of ADS, with £17 million declared due, 11 per cent of the Scotland total. Edinburgh tends to dominate LBTT excluding ADS declared due (33 per cent of the Scotland total) more than gross ADS (21 per cent of the Scotland total) (see Figure 17). This is because the ADS rate is flat whereas the LBTT rate excluding ADS is progressive, hence the effective tax rate (i.e. the ratio of LBTT excluding ADS due to total consideration) increases with total consideration.

Taxpayers stating that they do not intend to reclaim ADS accounted for £24 million (75 per cent) of the gross ADS declared due in City of Edinburgh, and £13 million (79 per cent) of the gross ADS declared due in Glasgow City. The proportion of gross ADS declared due by taxpayers stating that they do not intend to reclaim ADS was highest in Glasgow City (79 per cent) and lowest in East Dunbartonshire (45 per cent).

In 2020/21, for the first time since ADS was implemented in 2016, a majority of local authorities (18 out of 32) showed a decrease from the previous year in the proportion of ADS declared which taxpayers do not intend to reclaim, although in many cases the change was relatively small.

Figure 20: Estimated number of residential conveyance returns received with ADS declared due by local authority, intention to reclaim ADS and year

Image

Figure 20 shows estimates of the number of LBTT returns received with ADS declared due, and intention not to reclaim ADS, by local authority and year. Glasgow City accounted for most residential conveyances received with ADS declared due in 2020/21 with 2,600 returns (12.5 per cent of the Scotland total), exceeding City of Edinburgh (12 per cent of the Scotland total) for the first time since LBTT was introduced.

Taxpayers stating that they do not intend to reclaim ADS accounted for 89 per cent (2,300) of LBTT returns received with ADS declared due in Glasgow City and 84 per cent (2,100) of LBTT returns received with ADS declared due in City of Edinburgh. The proportion of LBTT returns received with ADS declared due where the taxpayer has stated that they do not intend to reclaim ADS was highest in Glasgow City (89 per cent) and North Lanarkshire (87 per cent) and lowest in Shetland Islands and Aberdeenshire (both 62 per cent).

2.7.3 Sub-Scotland: Residential conveyances not replacing a main residence

Figure 21: Estimates of the percentage (%) of all residential conveyance returns received where the taxpayer did not intend to reclaim ADS declared due, by local authority and year

Image

Figure 21 and Table 9 show estimates of the percentage of all residential LBTT returns received where the taxpayer does not intend to reclaim the ADS declared due, by local authority and year. This is an indicative measure of the percentage of all residential conveyances where the taxpayer (individual or organisation) is purchasing an additional property (e.g. buy-to-let dwelling or a second home) rather than replacing their main residence. In 2020/21 this was highest in Na h-Eileanan Siar (27 per cent of all residential transactions) and Argyll and Bute (25 per cent), and lowest in Midlothian (9 per cent), East Dunbartonshire (10 per cent), and Aberdeenshire (11 per cent). This figure has decreased in 19 local authorities between 2019/20 to 2020/21 with the greatest drop in Shetland Islands, from 20 per cent in 2019/20 to 16 per cent in 2020/21.

Table 9: Estimates of the percentage (%) of all residential conveyance returns received where ADS was declared due and the taxpayer did not intend to reclaim ADS, by local authority and year

2.7.4 Sub-Scotland: Residential tax bands

Figure 22: Distributions of residential LBTT returns by local authority and tax band, 2020/21

Image

Figure 22 shows the distribution of residential transactions by tax band in each local authority for the 2020/21 tax year. The top two residential tax bands (£325,000 to £750,000 and £750,000 and above) are combined to protect taxpayer confidentiality. East Renfrewshire had the highest proportion of returns in the combined £325k+ tax band (32%), followed closely by City of Edinburgh and East Lothian (both 29%). Furthermore, East Renfrewshire was the only local authority in which the bottom two tax bands accounted for less than half of the total transactions (49%).

City of Edinburgh had the highest proportion of returns in the underlying top-rate £750k+ band, with 4% of transactions. Furthermore, City of Edinburgh accounted for one-half of all transactions in the top-rate band, with 410 transactions with a consideration over £750k out of the national total of 820 transactions.

West Dunbartonshire had the highest proportion (67%) of transactions in the lowest, nil rate, tax band (£0-145k). Of the 32 local authorities, 13 local authorities had at least 50% of transactions falling into the lowest band.

2.7.5 Sub-Scotland: Non-residential conveyances

Figure 23: Estimates of LBTT declared due by NUTS 2 area ¹¹ and year for non-residential conveyances

Image

Figure 24: Estimated number of non-residential conveyance returns received by NUTS 2 area and year 

Image

Sub-Scotland estimates of LBTT declared due and the number of LBTT returns received for non-residential conveyances are provided by NUTS 2 areas instead of local authority areas to minimise the risk of disclosing protected taxpayer information. Eastern Scotland has accounted for the largest segment of LBTT declared due (39 to 48 per cent) and transactions (34 to 37 per cent) in each of the last six years. From 2019/20 to 2020/21, LBTT revenue from non-residential conveyances fell in Eastern Scotland, West Central Scotland and North Eastern Scotland while remaining around the same level in Highlands and Islands and Southern Scotland. Care should be taken when interpreting annual changes in LBTT declared due by NUTS 2 areas as non-residential LBTT revenues can be influenced by small numbers of very large transactions which can lead to significant year-to-year changes.

2.8 Reliefs

Revenue Scotland does not routinely (i.e. as part of its monthly LBTT Official Statistics publications) publish information on reliefs claimed or LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs. However, we are aware of the wide interest in this data and are committed to publishing information on reliefs via this annual publication.

There are various data quality issues with reliefs information collected from LBTT returns in previous years, although these issues do not affect the total LBTT declared due.

The most common data quality issue affecting total revenue foregone to reliefs is that, prior to the introduction of a new electronic tax system in July 2019, four per cent of taxpayers claiming reliefs incorrectly entered the value of the relief claimed as the full consideration - e.g. the total price of the property – rather than the LBTT amount that would be due without reliefs. This means that simply summing the value of reliefs claimed on tax returns would overstate the value of LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs. The LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs needs to be estimated from other information provided by the taxpayer, and hence the results presented are referred to as estimates. Full details of the methods used to produce the estimates can be found on the LBTT data requests section¹² of the Revenue Scotland website.

From 2015/16 to 2018/19, the relief amount was estimated in this way for 10 per cent of returns claiming a relief. Recent improvements to the tax system have reduced the need to estimate the relief amount, and in 2020/21, the relief amount was estimated for 1 per cent of returns.

It is also worth noting that the estimates are likely to underestimate ADS (and consequently LBTT) revenue forgone to reliefs to some extent. ADS is due on most purchases of a residential property by a non-natural person, such as a company. When a full relief is claimed reducing the LBTT liability to nil, in some cases the ADS has not been declared (rather than declared and reduced to nil by relief). Therefore, although the tax position is correct, it is likely that data on reliefs for residential transactions will underestimate ADS revenues forgone. There is a similar issue where a non-residential transaction contains a mixture of residential and commercial elements (‘mixed’ property transactions are treated as non-residential transactions for LBTT). Again, the overall tax position for the relevant transactions remains correct.

Table 10: Estimated LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs and the number of LBTT returns received in which LBTT revenue has been forgone to reliefs by year

Notes:

1. ADS revenue forgone to reliefs is distinct from claims for repayment of ADS following the sale of the taxpayer's previous main residence. 2. An LBTT return may have LBTT excluding ADS and ADS revenue forgone to reliefs if both are due and relief is claimed. This column counts LBTT returns where LBTT excluding ADS or ADS revenue has been forgone to reliefs and, therefore, will not equal the sum of the previous two columns. 

It is estimated that £104 million of LBTT revenue was forgone to reliefs in 2020/21, which represents a decrease of £8 million (7 per cent) on the previous year.

The number of LBTT returns received in which LBTT revenue has been forgone to reliefs increased each year until 2019/20, to around 16,000 LBTT returns in 2019/20, before dropping to around 3,000 in 2020/21. The main reason for this pattern is the impact of first-time buyer relief, which was introduced on 30 June 2018 and became temporarily ‘redundant’ from 15 July 2020 to 31 March 2021 due to the temporary change to the nil rate tax threshold. During this period no tax was due for transactions that would otherwise have claimed first time buyer relief. For further information on first-time buyer relief see the guidance published by Revenue Scotland.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/guidance/lbtt-legislation-guidance/exemptions-reliefs/lbtt3010-3#overlay-context=node/946/revisions/2116/view

ADS revenue forgone to reliefs¹³ is estimated to have accounted for 4 per cent of LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs since 2016/17.

Table 11: Estimated LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs and number of LBTT returns received in which LBTT revenue has been forgone to reliefs by type of property and year

Non-residential transactions account for the majority of LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs with residential transactions making up only 13 per cent of LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs over the 6 year period. In contrast, residential transactions have accounted for the majority of LBTT returns received in which LBTT revenue has been forgone to reliefs – around 58 per cent for first 3 years, rising to 95 per cent in 2019/20 following the introduction of First Time Buyer relief in June 2018, and falling to 76 per cent in 2020/21 when First Time Buyer relief was essentially ‘redundant’ for part of the year due to the temporary increase in the nil rate band threshold.

Figure 25: Estimated LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs by type of relief and year

Image

Group relief is estimated to have accounted for the majority (54 to 73 per cent) of revenue forgone each year. Changes in the total estimated LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs are largely driven by changes in revenue forgone to group relief.

Subject to certain rules, group relief provides relief from LBTT where, at the effective date, the seller and buyer are both companies in the same group. Where the rules are met, this allows companies to move property within a corporate group structure for commercial reasons without a liability for LBTT being incurred. For further information on group relief see the guidance published by Revenue Scotland¹⁴.

Users of this data should note that if group relief had been unavailable it is likely that many of the transactions that benefit from the relief would not have taken place.

Charities relief was second behind group relief in terms of LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs in 2020/21 and accounted for 10 per cent of the revenue forgone. For further information on charities relief see the guidance published by Revenue Scotland¹⁵ .

Figure 26: Estimated number of LBTT returns received in which LBTT revenue has been forgone to relief by type of relief and year

Image

Since the introduction of First-Time Buyer Relief on 30 June 2018, this was the most frequently claimed relief, accounting for 13,200 (85 per cent of) LBTT returns received in which LBTT revenue was forgone to relief in 2019/20. Claims for First-Time Buyer relief dropped off dramatically in 2020/21, when the relief had no effect for most of the year due to the temporary increase to the nil rate threshold (15 July 2020 to 31 March 2021).

Despite accounting for the vast majority of claims for LBTT relief, Figure 25 shows that First-Time Buyer relief accounts for only a small portion of the estimated LBTT revenue foregone to reliefs – less than 1 per cent in 2020/21, and 6 per cent in 2019/20. This is because First-Time Buyer relief provides a maximum of £600 relief from LBTT per transaction, unlike other relief types which can relieve the entire tax liability of potentially much larger transactions.

In previous years, 'Relief for certain acquisitions of residential property' has been the second most frequently claimed relief. Claims for this relief also fell from around 600 to 1,100 claims per year to fewer than 200 claims in 2020/21. This is also likely to be due to the temporary change to the nil rate threshold. In 2019/20, around 78 per cent of claims for this relief were for transactions with total consideration under £250,000, which would have been liable for nil LBTT from 15 July 2020 to 31 March 2021. This relief includes, for example:

• relief where a house building company buys a home from a person who is buying a new home,
• relief where a property trader buys a home from a person who is buying a new home from a house building company, and
• relief where a property trader buys a home to avoid a chain of transactions breaking down. For further information see the guidance published by Revenue Scotland.

https://www.revenue.scot/land-buildings-transaction-tax/guidance/lbtt-legislation-guidance/exemptions-reliefs/lbtt3010-tax

⁴Under the Coronavirus (Scotland) (No.2) Act 2020, introduced in May 2020, taxpayers who had bought a new main residence before 25 March 2020 (with an effective date for the purchase between 24 September 2018 and 24 March 2020) have 36 months from the effective date of the original transaction to sell their previous main residence before making a claim for repayment of the ADS

⁵ UK House Price Index: reports - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

⁶ See Registers of Scotland monthly house price statistics: House price statistics - Registers of Scotland (ros.gov.uk)

⁷ Residential conveyance transactions under £145,000 can incur tax liability if they are linked.

⁸Provided the taxpayer sells their previous main residence within 18 months of the effective date, they may submit their claim for repayment of ADS up to five years from the filing date. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2014/16/section/115 However, it is likely that most claims for repayment of ADS will be received shortly after the taxpayer has sold their previous main residence. Taxpayers who paid ADS on transactions with effective date from 25 September 2018 and 24 March 2020 have 36 months to reclaim ADS rather than the usual 18.

⁹Vigintiles divide data into 20 groups of equal frequency. The vigintiles for each year have been created by ordering the data by descending LBTT declared due. The first vigintile corresponds to the top five per cent of transactions (in terms of LBTT declared due) and so on.

¹⁰ The relevant file is dated 18 January 2019 and named ‘LBTT – Sub-Scotland Estimates of Revenues and Transactions.xlsx’.

¹¹ Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS) is a standard geographical classification system.

¹² The relevant file is dated 11 October 2018 and named ‘LBTT – reliefs.xlsx’

¹³ ADS revenue forgone to reliefs is distinct from claims for repayment of ADS following the sale of the taxpayer's previous main residence.

¹⁴ LBTT3025 - Group relief | Revenue Scotland

¹⁵ LBTT3035 - Charities relief | Revenue Scotland

Introduction

• Read more about Introduction

Revenue Scotland is responsible for the management and collection of Scotland’s devolved taxes – currently Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT) and Scottish Landfill Tax (SLfT).

Revenue Scotland began tax collection operations on 1 April 2015.

Revenue Scotland operates according to Adam Smith’s principles of taxation to ensure equity, certainty, convenience and efficiency in administering and managing devolved taxes.

The four principles are:

• Equity – proportionality to the ability of a taxpayer to pay;
• Certainty – maximising tax compliance, minimising tax avoidance and evasion;
• Convenience – ensuring tax systems and processes are open and accessible;
• Efficiency – ensuring tax systems are efficient and effective and represent value for money for Scotland.

Revenue Scotland has statutory powers in addition to the management and collection of the devolved taxes. These include:

• providing information, advice and assistance on tax matters for Scottish Ministers;
• providing information and assistance to taxpayers and agents;
• efficiently resolving devolved tax disputes;
• protecting tax revenue from tax fraud and avoidance.

This is Revenue Scotland’s fourth annual statistics publication summarising trends in the devolved taxes. This publication covers a six year period from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2021.

During the 2020/21 financial year, like many aspects of public life, property transactions, waste disposal and hence LBTT and SLfT revenues were significantly disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This edition of the annual statistics publication provides some commentary and additional context describing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the longer-term trends in devolved tax collection.

Revenue Scotland also publishes monthly official statistics on LBTT and quarterly official statistics on SLfT. More up-to-date statistics about collection of LBTT and SLfT from April 2021 onwards are available from these two publications.

Revenue Scotland’s monthly LBTT publication provides information on the LBTT declared due and number of LBTT returns received by month of submission, type of transaction (conveyance/lease/review of a lease), type of property (residential/non-residential) and total consideration. Information on the Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) declared due, the number of LBTT returns received with ADS declared due and the value and number of claims for repayment of ADS received is also provided.

https://www.revenue.scot/about-us/publications/statistics/land-and-buildings-transaction-tax-statistics-0

Revenue Scotland’s quarterly SLfT publication provides information on the SLfT declared due, declared taxable disposals by SLfT rate and contributions to the Scottish Landfill Communities Fund (SLCF).

https://www.revenue.scot/about-us/publications/statistics/scottish-landfill-tax-statistics

The data contained in Revenue Scotland’s monthly LBTT publication and quarterly SLfT publication are also available from statistics.gov.scot.

The purpose of this annual publication is to summarise and provide further commentary on Revenue Scotland’s official statistics publications and also to provide information that is not available in the monthly and quarterly official statistics publications, for example:

• Sub-Scotland estimates of LBTT declared due and the number of LBTT returns received
• Estimates of LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs and the number of LBTT returns received with LBTT revenue forgone to reliefs
• Taxable (SLfT) disposals by European Waste Catalogue (EWC) code.

This publication is distinct from Revenue Scotland’s Annual Report and Financial Statements. https://www.revenue.scot/about-us/publications/corporate-documents

As is the case with Revenue Scotland’s monthly LBTT publication, the LBTT data presented in this publication comes from LBTT returns and is based on the date the return was received by Revenue Scotland. Appendix A explains how data on this basis relates to data on an effective date² basis.

Appendix B explains how Revenue Scotland’s official statistics publications relate to its Annual Report and Financial Statements.

The LBTT legislation prescribes that an LBTT return must be submitted and arrangements made for payment of the LBTT due to Revenue Scotland before the Keeper of the Registers of Scotland can proceed with registration of title. The LBTT return includes a range of information about the transaction, tax liabilities and reliefs claimed. Amendments and corrections can be made to LBTT returns up to one year following the filing date³. This may lead to revisions to the LBTT data in this publication. The vast majority of LBTT returns are submitted online via the Revenue Scotland website by agents acting on behalf of taxpayers.

Users should note that this publication is not a commentary on the volume or value of land and property transactions in Scotland. Registers of Scotland publish comprehensive property data for Scotland.

https://www.ros.gov.uk/data-and-statistics

Similarly, the SLfT data presented in this publication comes from SLfT returns and is based on the period the return relates to.

A SLfT return must be submitted and arrangements made for payment of the SLfT due to Revenue Scotland by 44 days after the end of the quarter. The SLfT return includes a range of information about the tax liabilities and credits claimed, along with supplementary information on the type and amount of waste disposed of in the quarter. Amendments and corrections can be made to SLfT returns up to one year following the filing date. This may lead to revisions to the SLfT data in this publication. The vast majority of SLfT returns are submitted online via the Revenue Scotland portal.

Users should note that this publication is not a commentary on the volume of waste from all sources or volume of waste landfilled in Scotland. The Scottish Environment Protection Agency publish comprehensive waste data for Scotland.

https://www.sepa.org.uk/environment/waste/waste-data/

This publication is an Official Statistics publication for Scotland. Official and National Statistics are produced to high professional standards set out in the Code of Practice for Official Statistics. Both undergo regular quality assurance reviews to ensure that they meet customer needs and are produced free from any political interference.

https://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/code-of-practice/

The figures and tables in this publication can be downloaded from the Revenue Scotland website.

https://www.revenue.scot/about-us/publications/statistics

All data were extracted as at 31 May 2021 but, in keeping with Revenue Scotland’s revisions policy, some of the data relating to earlier years has not been updated. For LBTT, only data for 2018-19 onwards has been updated (and for sub-Scotland geographies, only the most recent year was updated). For SLfT, only data from 2019-20 onwards has been updated. If you need any further information or have any comments or suggestions on how this publication or the official statistics Revenue Scotland produce can be improved then please contact us using the details below.

Andrew Macartney

Statistician

Revenue Scotland

Email: statistics@revenue.scot



This publication is Crown Copyright and is released under the Open Government Licence. You are free to reuse this information provided the source is acknowledged.

 

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

²Typically the effective date of a land transaction is the date that the land transaction is completed. For further information on the effective date see the guidance published by Revenue Scotland

³https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2014/16/section/83

Revenue Scotland Amends Interest Rates in Line with Bank of England Rate

• Read more about Revenue Scotland Amends Interest Rates in Line with Bank of England Rate

Summary Financial Data

• Read more about Summary Financial Data

Devolved Taxes 2015-2021

Image

LBTT 2015-2021

Image

SLfT 2015-2021

Image

Resource Spend (including programme costs) 2015-2021

Financial Statements 2020-21

• Read more about Financial Statements 2020-21

Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure

For the Year Ended 31 March 2021

Statement of Financial Position

As at 31 March 2021

The notes on pages 92 to 105 form part of these financial statements. The Chief Executive and Accountable Officer authorised these financial statements for issue on 24 November 2021

Statement of Cash Flows

For the year ended 31 March 2021

Statement of Changes in Taxpayers’ Equity

For the year ended 31 March 2021

The Notes to the Accounts form part of these financial statements.

Notes to the Accounts

1. Statement of Accounting Policies

1.1 Basis of accounting

In line with section 12 of the Revenue Scotland and Tax Powers Act 2014, and in accordance with the accounts direction issued by the Scottish ministers under section 19(4) of the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000, these financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the 2019-20 Government Financial Reporting Manual (FReM) issued by HM Treasury. The accounting policies contained in the FReM apply International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adapted or interpreted for the public sector context. The particular policies adopted are described below. They have been applied consistently in dealing with items that are considered material to the accounts.

The accounts are prepared using accounting policies, and where necessary, estimation techniques which are judged to be most appropriate to the particular circumstances for the purpose of giving a true and fair view in accordance with the principles set out in International Accounting Standards (IAS) 8 Accounting Policies, Changing in Accounting Estimates and Errors.

In accordance with the FReM these accounts have been prepared under the historical cost convention and on a going concern basis, which provides that the organisation will continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future.

1.2 Accounting convention

The accounts have been prepared in accordance with the historical cost convention modified to account for fair value of non-current assets. Expenditure has been accounted for on an accruals basis.

1.3 New Accounting Standards

In accordance with IAS 8, changes to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) that have been issued but not yet effective have been reviewed for impact on the financial statements in the period of initial application. The standards that are considered relevant to Revenue Scotland and the anticipated impact on the accounts are as follows:

IFRS 16 – Leases

We previously reported that this standard was due to come into effect for accounting periods commencing after 1 April 2020. However HM Treasury agreed with the Financial Reporting Advisory Board (FRAB) to defer the implementation of this standard until 1 April 2021 due to circumstances caused by COVID-19. When implemented the distinction between finance and operating leases is removed and all leases become "on balance sheet". The FReM interprets and adapts IFRS 16 for the public sector context in several ways. Information is currently being gathered to identify all right of use and leased assets not currently capitalised. The full impact has not yet been determined. These assets will be included on the statement of financial position from 1 April 2021, in accordance with the transition arrangements set out in IFRS 16 application guidance originally issued by HM Treasury in April 2019 and updated in March 2020.

1.4 Value Added Tax (VAT)

Revenue Scotland is registered for VAT as part of the Scottish Government VAT group registration which is responsible for recovering VAT on behalf of Revenue Scotland.

Revenue Scotland does not provide any chargeable services and therefore output VAT does not apply. Irrecoverable input VAT is charged to the relevant expenditure category. Where VAT is recoverable, the amounts are stated net of VAT.

1.5 Property, Plant, Equipment and Intangible Assets

Recognition

All property, plant, equipment and intangible assets are accounted for as non-current assets unless they are deemed to be held for sale.

Capitalisation

Minor expenditure on equipment and furniture are written off in the year of purchase, as are all other items of a capital nature costing less than £10,000.

Assets under development

Assets under development are shown separately in note 5. Costs are accumulated until the assets is brought into use whereupon it is transferred into the relevant asset class and depreciated.

Staff costs

Where staff have been working on the development, integration and testing of IT software, these costs are included in the amounts capitalised.

Depreciation and Amortisation

Provision for depreciation and amortisation is made so as to write off the cost of non-current assets on a straight line basis over the expected useful lives of the assets concerned. The expected useful lives of assets are regularly and systematically reviewed to ensure that they genuinely reflect the actual replacement cycle of all assets. Depreciation and amortisation are not charged on assets in the course of development until the month after they are brought into use.

The expected useful lives are as follows:

• computer equipment 3-10 years;
• IT systems 3–10 years;
• office equipment 3-10 years;
• furniture and fittings 3-15 years.

Asset Valuation

Depreciated and amortised historical cost is used as a proxy for fair value since the assets are low value and have short useful lives.

1.6 Financial instruments

As the cash requirements of Revenue Scotland are met through the Scottish Government, financial instruments play a limited role in creating and managing risk. The only financial instruments within the accounts are financial assets in the form of other receivables, and financial liabilities in the form of trade and other liabilities.

1.7 Leases

Operating leases are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure on a straight line basis over the term of the lease.

1.8 Pension costs

Revenue Scotland employees are civil servants who are entitled to be members of the Civil Servant and Others Pension Scheme or the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme. These are unfunded, multi-employer defined benefit schemes in which Revenue Scotland is unable to identify its share of the underlying assets and liabilities. The schemes are accounted for as defined contribution schemes under the multi-employer exemption permitted in IAS 19 Employee Benefits.

Revenue Scotland's contribution is recognised as a cost in the year.

1.9 Short-term employee benefits

The cost of annual leave and flexible working time entitlement earned but not taken by employees at the end of the year is recognised as an accrual of benefits in the financial statements to the extent that employees are permitted to carry forward leave into the following year.

1.10 Other receivables

Other receivables are stated at their nominal value.

1.11 Trade and other payables

Trade payables are stated at their nominal value.

1.12 Provisions for liabilities and charges

A provision is recognised where an outflow of resources is expected as a result of a past event. These are included within the accounts at the estimated value.

2. Staff Costs

During 2020-21 staff were seconded to Scottish Government and the associated staff costs were recharged accordingly. More details on staff numbers and related costs can be found in the Staff Report.

3. Goods and services

Revenues Scotland's goods and services costs have been allocated as follows:

• Administration – this is the general day-to-day running of Revenue Scotland which includes the costs associated with the collection and administration of tax.
• Programme – reflects non-administration costs, this is the cost of developing processes and systems to comply with new legislation or the introduction of new IT systems.

(1) In the interests of efficiency, effectiveness and economy, Revenue Scotland and the Scottish Ministers are committed to identifying opportunities for shared services. The amount represents costs charged by the Scottish Government for the following functions:

• Human Resource management (including, for example: general terms and conditions of service, pay negotiations, pay awards, payroll, pensions and recruitment for senior civil service posts);
• Financial management (Scottish Government finance systems);
• Information Systems, Telephony, Information and Library Service;
• Estates and facilities management;
• Internal audit; and
• Procurement.

(2) Delegated duties represents the amounts payable to Registers of Scotland and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency in relation to the duties delegated to them under the Revenue Scotland and Tax Powers Act 2014.

4. Reconciliation of net resource outturn to net funding received

5. Non-current assets

Tangible Assets

Intangible Assets

The balance shown as being for the IT system under development at 31 March 2020 had been incurred prior to the year end but relate to a system update which was implemented into the live system after 31 March 2020

6. Other receivables

7. Trade and other payables

8. Provision for liabilities and charges

This provision relates to the potential reimbursement of taxpayers’ legal fees incurred in preparation for tribunal hearings where Revenue Scotland withdrew their opposition. The amounts provided in 2019-20 have either been settled during 2020-21 or agreement reached to settle and been included within accruals as an event after the reporting period.

9. Related party transactions

Revenue Scotland is a non-ministerial office of the Scottish Administration and it considers that the Scottish Government is a related party within this context. During the year Revenue Scotland has had a number of material financial transactions with the Scottish Government.

In line with the RSTPA, Section 2, Revenue Scotland has delegated some of its functions relating to SLfT to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA).

Functions related to LBTT were delegated to Registers of Scotland (RoS) until July 2019 when these functions were brought in-house.

None of the board members, key managerial staff or other related parties has undertaken any material transactions with Revenue Scotland during the year. 

10. Audit fee

The following charges have been included in the accounts:

Auditor's remuneration is disclosed as a notional charge and relates to fees notified to Revenue Scotland by Audit Scotland in respect of audit work carried out in relation to the year ended 31 March 2021. All audit fees are paid from the Scottish Consolidated Fund.

No non-audit work was carried out by Audit Scotland during the year ended 31 March 2021.

11. Commitments

Total future minimum payments under contractual commitments are given in the tables below for each of the following periods:

Revenue Commitments

The amounts above are in relation to the contracts for the provision of Revenue Scotland’s tax and finance systems. The contract for the original SETS tax system expired in August 2019. The new system went live in July 2019 and the contract will expire in 2029. The contract for the finance system was renewed in December 2020 for one year with an option to extend for one further year. Amounts charged in 2020-21 of £317,000 (2019-20: £325,000) are included within computer and telephone costs in note 3 above. 

Capital Commitments

The above amount is in relation to developments to the tax system agreed prior to March 2021.

12. Events after the reporting period

A provision was included in the 2019-20 financial statements in respect of liability for taxpayer expenses. After the end of the reporting period the liability was determined and the estimated amount concerned has therefore been treated as an adjusting event and transferred to other accruals.

Independent Auditor's Report

• Read more about Independent Auditor's Report

Independent auditor's report to Revenue Scotland, the Auditor General for Scotland and the Scottish Parliament

Report on the audit of the financial statements

Opinion on financial statements

I have audited the financial statements in the annual report and accounts of Revenue Scotland (Resource Accounts) for the year ended 31 March 2021 under the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000. The financial statements comprise the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure, the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Cash Flows, the Statement of Changes in Taxpayers’ Equity and notes to the financial statements including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union, and as interpreted and adapted by the 2020/21 Government Financial Reporting Manual (the 2020/21 FReM).

In my opinion the accompanying financial statements:

• give a true and fair view in accordance with the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000 and directions made thereunder by the Scottish Ministers of the state of the body’s affairs as at 31 March 2021 and of its net expenditure for the year then ended;
• have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union, as interpreted and adapted by the 2020/21 FReM; and
• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000 and directions made thereunder by the Scottish Ministers.

Basis for opinion

I conducted my audit in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)), as required by the Code of Audit Practice approved by the Auditor General for Scotland. My responsibilities under those standards are further described in the auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of my report. I was appointed by the Auditor General on 9 March 2015. The period of total uninterrupted appointment is five years. I am independent of the body in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to my audit of the financial statements in the UK including the Financial Reporting Council's Ethical Standard, and I have fulfilled my other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. Non-audit services prohibited by the Ethical Standard were not provided to the body. I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for my opinion.

Conclusions relating to going concern basis of accounting

I have concluded that the use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Based on the work I have performed, I have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the body’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

Risks of material misstatement

I have reported in a separate Annual Audit Report, which is available from the Audit Scotland website, the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement that I identified and my conclusions thereon.

Responsibilities of the Accountable Officer for the financial statements

As explained more fully in the Statement of the Accountable Officer's responsibilities, the Accountable Officer is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the financial reporting framework, and for such internal control as the Accountable Officer determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Accountable Officer is responsible for using the going concern basis of accounting unless deemed inappropriate.

Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

My objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes my opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. I design procedures in line with my responsibilities outlined above to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. Procedures include:

• obtaining an understanding of the applicable legal and regulatory framework and how the body is complying with that framework
• identifying which laws and regulations are significant in the context of the body
• assessing the susceptibility of the financial statements to material misstatement, including how fraud might occur
• considering whether the audit team collectively has the appropriate competence and capabilities to identify or recognise non-compliance with laws and regulations

The extent to which my procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is affected by the inherent difficulty in detecting irregularities, the effectiveness of the body’s controls, and the nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures performed. Irregularities that result from fraud are inherently more difficult to detect than irregularities that result from error as fraud may involve collusion, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. The capability of the audit to detect fraud and other irregularities depends on factors such as the skilfulness of the perpetrator, the frequency and extent of manipulation, the degree of collusion involved, the relative size of individual amounts manipulated, and the seniority of those individuals involved.

A further description of the auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council's website www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of my auditor's report.

Report on regularity of expenditure and income

Opinion on regularity

In my opinion in all material respects:

• the expenditure and income in the financial statements were incurred or applied in accordance with any applicable enactments and guidance issued by the Scottish Ministers, the Budget (Scotland) Act covering the financial year and sections 4 to 7 of the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000; and
• the sums paid out of the Scottish Consolidated Fund for the purpose of meeting the expenditure shown in the financial statements were applied in accordance with section 65 of the Scotland Act 1998.

Responsibilities for regularity

The Accountable Officer is responsible for ensuring the regularity of expenditure and income. I am responsible for expressing an opinion on the regularity of expenditure and income in accordance with the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000.

Report on other requirements

Opinion prescribed by the Auditor General for Scotland on audited part of the Remuneration and Staff Report

I have audited the parts of the Remuneration and Staff Report described as audited. In my opinion, the audited part of the Remuneration and Staff Report has been properly prepared in accordance with the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000 and directions made thereunder by the Scottish Ministers.

Statutory other information

The Accountable Officer is responsible for the statutory other information in the annual report and accounts. The statutory other information comprises the Performance Report and the Accountability Report excluding the audited part of the Remuneration and Staff Report. My responsibility is to read all the statutory other information and, in doing so, consider whether the statutory other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or my knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If I identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, I am required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work I have performed, I conclude that there is a material misstatement of this statutory other information, I am required to report that fact. I have nothing to report in this regard. My opinion on the financial statements does not cover the statutory other information and I do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon except on the Performance Report and Governance Statement to the extent explicitly stated in the following opinions prescribed by the Auditor General for Scotland.

Opinions prescribed by the Auditor General for Scotland on Performance Report and Governance

Statement In my opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

• the information given in the Performance Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements and that report has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000 and directions made thereunder by the Scottish Ministers
• the information given in the Governance Statement for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements and that report has been prepared in accordance with the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000 and directions made thereunder by the Scottish Ministers

Matters on which I am required to report by exception

I am required by the Auditor General for Scotland to report to you if, in my opinion:

• adequate accounting records have not been kept; or
• the financial statements and the audited part of the Remuneration and Staff Report are not in agreement with the accounting records; or
• I have not received all the information and explanations I require for my audit.

I have nothing to report in respect of these matters.

Conclusions on wider scope responsibilities

In addition to my responsibilities for the annual report and accounts, my conclusions on the wider scope responsibilities specified in the Code of Audit Practice are set out in my Annual Audit Report.

Use of my report

This report is made solely to the parties to whom it is addressed in accordance with the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000 and for no other purpose. In accordance with paragraph 120 of the Code of Audit Practice, I do not undertake to have responsibilities to members or officers, in their individual capacities, or to third parties.

Mark Taylor

Audit Director

Audit Scotland

102 West Port

Edinburgh

EH3 9DN

Accountability Report 2020-21

• Read more about Accountability Report 2020-21

Corporate Governance Report

The Directors’ Report

Revenue Scotland Board 2020-21

In line with paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the RSTPA, the Scottish Ministers are responsible for appointing between five and nine individuals to be members of the Revenue Scotland Board. One individual is appointed by Ministers as Chair.

Ministers determine the period and terms of appointment of Board members and may re-appoint individuals who already are, or have been on the Board, subject to evidence of effective performance and to their continuing to have the skills, knowledge and experience required on the Board at the time of reappointment.

Appointments are made following a public appointments exercise regulated by the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland.

In the financial year 2020-21, Simon Cunningham was appointed to the Board on 1 January 2021 having previously been a co-opted member of the Audit and Risk Committee.

Dr Keith Nicholson – Chair (appointment concluded 31 July 2021)



Dr Nicholson is an internationally recognised scientist and award-winning company director with more than 30 years’ experience in statistical analysis and data modelling. He currently runs an independent consultancy providing strategic advisory services. His specialist background is in transactional websites, cyber security and technology.

Aidan O’Carroll – Chair (appointed 1 August 2021)

Aidan O’Carroll is a former senior partner at EY, one of the world’s largest professional services firms, which he left in July 2020 after 35 years. Formerly Head of Tax for EY in the UK, Aidan has advised both local and global companies across a wide spectrum of tax and business issues around the world. He is currently Scottish Chair of Institute of Directors and has a number of NonExecutive Director roles in organisations based in the UK. He has considerable experience in dealing with regulatory matters in both emerging and developed markets; he is also a regular contributor and speaker at business conferences.

Lynn Bradley – Chair of Audit and Risk Committee



Lynn Bradley is an accountant with more than 30 years’ experience in the Scottish public and private sectors. Previous roles include Director of Corporate Programmes and Performance at Audit Scotland and Chair of CIPFA Scotland. She currently lectures in the Adam Smith Business School at the University of Glasgow and is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS) Audit and Assurance panel. She is also a trustee of Cash for Kids (Radio Clyde).

Jean Lindsay – Member of Staffing and Equality Committee until 1 January 2021 when she became Chair



Jean Lindsay was previously the Director of Human Resources at the Forestry Commission. She is a Chartered Fellow of the Institute of Personnel and Development (FCIPD). She has experience in leadership, strategic people management, change management and corporate governance in the public sector. Mrs Lindsay is also a member of the Board of Crown Estate Scotland.

John Whiting CBE – Member of Audit and Risk Committee and Staffing and Equalities Committee

John Whiting was a non-executive director of HMRC until September 2019; he remains a director of the Taxation Disciplinary Board; until March 2017, he was Tax Director of the UK’s Office of Tax Simplification (OTS). Other previous roles include Tax Policy Director of the Chartered Institute of Taxation, many years as a tax partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers and membership of the First-tier Tax Tribunal.

Martin McEwen – Member of the Audit and Risk Committee

Martin McEwen is a Chartered Accountant and Tax Advisor. He is the Head of Tax at SSE plc and a member of their Finance Leadership Team. He joined the company in 2008 after a number of years at PwC. He is a regular speaker on tax transparency and responsible corporate tax behaviour. He has sat on both the Scottish Taxes and the Corporate Tax Committees at ICAS.

Simon Cunningham – Member of Audit and Risk Committee (co-opted member of ARC until 1 January 2021 when he became a full member of the Board)

Simon Cunningham is an experienced risk, audit and governance specialist and Chartered Accountant with audit and risk experience at Scott-Moncrieff, Aegon and McInroy & Wood. He is also a member of the ARC at the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, a member of the Board of Directors of the Free Church of Scotland Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd, and is a member of the Board of Compass Christian Centre Ltd.

Jane Ryder OBE – Chair of the Staffing and Equalities Committee (appointment concluded 31 December 2020)

Jane Ryder is a qualified solicitor and now specialises in corporate governance and regulation across the public, private and third sectors. Previous roles include being the first Chief Executive of the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) and Deputy Chair of the Seafish Industry Authority. She is currently Chair of Historic Environment Scotland and of the Scottish Poetry Library, and a member of the Scottish Police Authority Board.

Ian Tait  – (appointment concluded 31 December 2020)

Ian Tait is Director of Network Regulation at the Water Industry Commission for Scotland and an independent member of Ofgem’s ESO Performance Panel. A regulatory specialist, he has advised the Scottish Government on the development of regulatory structures. Previous posts include Strategic Planning Manager and Transmission System Manager at Scottish and Southern Energy.

Further information about the interests of Board Members can be found on the Revenue Scotland website.

Senior Leadership Team 2020-21

Elaine Lorimer – Chief Executive

Elaine Lorimer joined Revenue Scotland as its Chief Executive in March 2016. She is an experienced Chief Executive who has more than 20 years leadership experience working at senior management and board level in the civil service and, prior to that, in local government in Scotland. She is a Scottish solicitor and public finance accountant.

Michael Paterson – Head of Tax

Michael Paterson joined Revenue Scotland in March 2019 and has lead responsibility for the administration and compliance of the devolved taxes, ensuring they are collected and administered efficiently and effectively. Michael has extensive knowledge and operational experience of UK taxes, particularly those dealing with international matters, resulting from 30 years as a senior tax professional with HMRC. His wide-ranging and senior tax roles have been in areas including technical, policy, investigations and management.

Mairi Gibson – Head of Legal Services

Mairi Gibson joined Revenue Scotland in February 2020. She has been a government lawyer since 1998. Over the years she been seconded to various posts within the Government Legal Service for Scotland including the Scottish Government Legal Directorate, Scottish Parliament and the Office of the Advocate General.

Neil Ferguson – Head of Corporate Functions

Neil Ferguson joined Revenue Scotland in January 2016 and has worked on the introduction of the Additional Dwelling Supplement, led the Air Departure Tax Programme and the Corporate Plan 2018-21. He previously worked on the devolved taxes legislation until 2015, on the Referendum Bill and the introduction of the Home Report which transformed the approach to buying and selling homes in Scotland.

Further information about members of the Senior Leadership Team can be found on the Revenue Scotland website.

Statement of the Accountable

Officer’s responsibilities Under section 19(4) of the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000, the Scottish Ministers have directed Revenue Scotland to prepare, for each financial year, a statement of accounts in the form and the basis set out in the Accounts Direction. The accounts are prepared on an accruals basis and must give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of Revenue Scotland and of its revenue and expenditure, statement of financial position and cash flows for the financial year.

The Chief Executive of Revenue Scotland is designated as the Accountable Officer for Revenue Scotland by the Permanent Secretary of the Scottish Government (SG), who is the Principal Accountable Officer for the Scottish Administration, in accordance with sections 14 and 15 of the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000.

In preparing the accounts the Accountable Officer is required to comply with the requirements of the Government Financial Reporting Manual (FReM) and has:

• observed the Accounts Direction issued by Scottish Ministers, including the relevant accounting and disclosure requirements, and apply suitable accounting policies on a consistent basis
• made judgements and estimates on a reasonable basis
• stated whether applicable accounting standards as set out in the FReM have been followed and disclose and explain any material departures in the financial statements
• prepared the accounts on a going concern basis

The responsibilities of an Accountable Officer, including responsibility for the propriety and regularity of the public finances for which she is answerable, for keeping proper records and for safeguarding Revenue Scotland’s assets, are set out in the Scottish Public Financial Manual.

The Accountable Officer may consult with the SG Chief Financial Officer (CFO) on any aspects of the duties applying to Accountable Officers in the Scottish Administration. The Accountable Officer must consult the CFO on any action which she considers is inconsistent with her duties on financial, regulatory or propriety grounds, and specifically where she seeks written authority from the Scottish Ministers or a direction from the Board of Revenue Scotland. In practice, the Chief Executive will delegate authority widely to other employees of Revenue Scotland but cannot, on that account, disclaim responsibility. The Chief Executive is responsible for informing the Principal Accountable Officer about any complaints about Revenue Scotland accepted by the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) for investigation and about the response to any subsequent recommendations from the SPSO.

I have taken all the steps that I ought to have taken to make myself aware of any relevant audit information, and to establish that Revenue Scotland’s auditors are aware of that information. So far as I am aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware.

I confirm that this Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and take personal responsibility for the Annual Report and Accounts and the judgements required for determining that it is fair, balanced and understandable.

Governance Statement

In the paragraphs below, I report on the governance arrangements in place within Revenue Scotland.

Governance Framework

Revenue Scotland is responsible for the administration and collection of Scotland’s wholly devolved taxes. The relevant powers and duties of Revenue Scotland, and of the Scottish Ministers are set out in the Revenue Scotland and Tax Powers Act 2014.

Scottish Ministers are responsible for appointing the Board of Revenue Scotland following a public appointment exercise, regulated by the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland. Ministers must not direct, or otherwise seek to control Revenue Scotland in the exercise of its functions but they may give guidance. This guidance must be published and laid before the Scottish Parliament unless Ministers consider that to do so would prejudice the effective exercise by Revenue Scotland of its functions. Scottish Ministers are responsible for setting rates, bands and thresholds relating to the devolved taxes, subject to the approval of the Scottish Parliament.

The Board of Revenue Scotland is collectively responsible for the leadership and direction of the organisation and for ensuring that it carries out its statutory functions effectively and efficiently. It may delegate any of its functions to an individual Board member, a committee of the Board, the Chief Executive, or any other staff member, but it will retain its responsibility for carrying out its function.

As the Chief Executive of Revenue Scotland, I am employed by, and accountable to, the Board of Revenue Scotland for the day-to-day running of the organisation and its operational performance.

I am supported by the Senior Leadership Team (SLT), who oversee the day-to-day business of Revenue Scotland, with each member taking responsibility for a specific area. The SLT is made up of the Chief Executive, the Head of Tax, the Head of Corporate Functions and the Head of Legal Services.

Operation of the Governance Board and Committees

The Board is responsible for the functions and powers of Revenue Scotland and delegates authority to staff through a Scheme of Internal Delegation. The Board sets the strategic direction for the organisation, oversees Revenue Scotland’s work and monitors performance including the design and operation of risk and governance frameworks. They do this through scrutiny (and where appropriate) approval of:

• Corporate Plans and Business Plans
• key strategies and policies
• regular reports, including reports relating to risk management, performance, tax compliance, business continuity, staffing and health and safety, and changes in the devolved taxes
• scrutiny of the Annual Reports and Accounts
• reports from the Audit and Risk and Staffing and Equality Committees
• strategic engagement with key partners and customers

I can report that in the course of the year, the Board met on eight occasions (2019-20: ten) . During this time, the Board scrutinised a number of specific matters, including:

• making a number of significant decisions on LBTT and SLfT cases (in line with the Scheme of Internal Delegation)
• oversight of the implementation of the changes to LBTT rates
• oversight of litigation cases and the implications for the organisation following the outcome
• oversight of the significant changes to the organisation’s operating model in response to the COVID-19 pandemic – such as the suspension of penalties and debt pursuit, opening systems like SETS and contact management system to remote working, changes to policy on the acceptability of paper returns and payment by cheques, and the creation of an operations hub at St Andrew’s House etc
• how best to support the SEPA staff working with Revenue Scotland following the cyber-attack of December 2020
• strategic oversight of the Futures programme to establish a new way of working for the organisation in light of the experience of working remotely as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic

I can also report that, during 2020-21, in line with best practice, the Board and its Committees have reviewed their effectiveness and the Chair has conducted individual Board appraisals.

Audit and Risk Committee

The purpose of the Audit and Risk Committee is to support the Board and Accountable Officer by reviewing the comprehensiveness, reliability, and integrity of the assurances produced in support of financial reports. The terms of reference for the Committee are published on Revenue Scotland’s website within the Board Standing Orders.

The Committee fulfils its role through:

• scrutiny of risk management arrangements
• regular liaison with internal and external audit, and scrutiny of their plans and reports
• considering and monitoring of responses to recommendations from internal and external auditors and other bodies
• review of the certificates of assurance produced by management as part of the financial reporting process, and the Chief Executive’s Governance Statement
• overseeing the financial reporting process

Members of the committee in 2020-21 were Lynn Bradley (Chair), John Whiting (until May 2021), Martin McEwen and Simon Cunningham.

Simon Cunningham, who initially joined the ARC in November 2019 as a co-optee, was appointed as a member of the Board on 1 January 2021.

The Committee is also attended by the Chief Executive, Head of Corporate Functions, Head of Tax, Head of Governance, Chief Accountant, and representatives of internal and external audit as well as other staff members as required.

I can report that the committee met five times in 2020-21 (including a Special ARC to scrutinise the Annual Reports and Accounts) (2019-20: five).

The Committee reviewed its effectiveness using the checklist set out in the Scottish Government’s Audit Committee Handbook and found no issues of concern which could affect its normal function.

In the course of the year, I can report that the Committee actively engaged in a number of relevant matters, including:

• Internal and External Audit
• Review of the Corporate Risk Register
• 2020-21 Annual Report and Accounts

Whilst the approved Internal Audit Plan for 2020-21 was not completed fully as a result of COVID-19, the Plan was substantially completed with some advisory audit work being paused.

Staffing and Equalities Committee

The Staffing and Equalities Committee’s primary purpose is to provide assurance to the Revenue Scotland Board on the establishment and maintenance of an effective framework and systems for the remuneration, performance, evaluation and welfare of staff, including equality and diversity. The terms of reference for the Committee are published on Revenue Scotland’s website within the Board’s Standing Orders document.

The Committee comprised of three Board members (Jane Ryder, John Whiting and Jean Lindsay) until 31 December 2020 when Jane Ryder (Chair) completed her appointment. It is now comprised of two Board members – Jean Lindsay (Chair) and John Whiting. Staff attendees comprise the Chief Executive, Head of Corporate Functions, the Head of Tax, the Head of Legal Services who leads the Equalities group, the Head of People Services, and the Head of Governance who has responsibility for Health, Safety and Wellbeing. Further staff members attend as required.

I can report that the Committee met three times during 2020-21 (2019-20: four) and engaged in a number of relevant matters including scrutiny of:

• People Strategy 2020-21 Action Plan
• Development of the 2021-2024 People Strategy
• 2019 People Survey Action Plan; \ Workforce Planning
• Health and Safety and Wellbeing (including the provision of accredited H&S training for the Board and SLT)
• Development and delivery of the STEP programme.
• Equality and diversity
• HR resource

Assurances provided to the Chief Executive

I have received written assurances from members of my Heads of Service who have responsibility for the operation and effectiveness of internal controls within the Tax, Legal, and Corporate Functions teams. The assurances from Heads of Service continue to recognise the progress being made around the establishment of an appropriate and effective Health and Safety system for Revenue Scotland.

Whilst the 2019-20 annual report correctly highlighted the push toward complete compliance relating to all Health and Safety matters, I am confident that this has now been achieved in the period since last year’s report and that regular reports on performance and continued progress are now made to the SEC, Board and Senior Leadership Team (SLT). Progress in this area has been further cemented through the NEBOSH accredited training on H&S that was provided for the Board and SLT.

A wider training and awareness programme is being developed by the Committee. In a similar vein, the assurance statements received also highlight the progress made around embedding equalities policy and practice throughout the organisation, an important aspect of how we work and led by the Head of Legal Services as SLT sponsor.

I have also received specific assurance from the Head of Tax to confirm that internal controls around tax activities and decisions are working well, and through the support of the Tax Assurance Group (TAG) oversight of issues as they arise have been strengthened.

For those services which Revenue Scotland receives from the Scottish Government, I have received assurance from the Scottish Government’s Chief Financial Officer in respect of the financial systems, from the Scottish Government’s Director for People in respect of the human resources (HR) services and payroll systems shared with Revenue Scotland and from Scottish Government’s Director of Digital in respect of digital corporate services shared with Revenue Scotland. No issues of significance were raised with me as part of these.

I am satisfied that the progress made around the specific assurances sought in 2019-20 from the Director for People concerning the need for progress on concluding revised arrangements with Revenue Scotland that reflect our status as a separate employer have been progressed. Work in this area will be concluded in 2021-22. The Scottish Government is now investing significantly in this area and so as a client, we expect to benefit from this investment.

I have also received assurance from the Accountable Officer of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency in respect of the statutory functions delegated to them by Revenue Scotland. As a result of the cyber-attack on SEPA in December 2020, only limited assurances could be provided on the effectiveness of shared data controls, and the impact to SEPA (as regulator) of the Scottish Landfill Communities Fund (SLCF). Details of the actions taken and additional assurance requests made are set out at page 14 in the Risks and Issues section. No further issues of concern were raised by them.

These arrangements have been in operation throughout 2020-21, up to, and including the date of authorisation of these accounts.

In conclusion, I can confirm that, based on the aforementioned written assurances received, there were no other significant control weaknesses identified in the period under review.

Report on Personal Data Incidents

Revenue Scotland manages, maintains and protects all information according to the requirements of relevant legislation, its own information policies and best practice. Revenue Scotland has an Information Assurance governance structure which prioritises and manages information risks. The governance structure:

• protects the organisation, its staff and our customers from information risks where the likelihood of occurrence and the consequences are significant
• ensures adherence with statutory duties
• assists in safeguarding Revenue Scotland’s information assets

Revenue Scotland has a Senior Information Risk Owner (SIRO) and a number of Information Asset Owners (IAOs), who provide assurance to the SIRO that proper controls are in place. The SIRO role is to ensure information security policies and procedures are fit for purpose and are reviewed and implemented across all of Revenue Scotland’s business functions.

The IAOs are tasked with ensuring compliance with statutory duties, knowing what information assets they ‘own’ and what information they handle, along with the relevant security requirements, sensitivity, importance and protocols for sharing of information assets.

In addition, all staff are aware that they need to report any data breaches immediately to Revenue Scotland’s IAO and SIRO. They are required to undertake regular training and information sessions. A refresh of the training sessions was completed mid-year and a schedule of workshops was held with each team on assuring our data.

During the year, there was one incident that was notified to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The incident related to one taxpayer and a number of minor actions were agreed and implemented to reduce the risk of a re-occurrence.

In January 2021, Revenue Scotland stood up an Incident Management Group, which included the SIRO, in response to the cyber-attack on SEPA. It was established that there was no known direct impact on personal data held by Revenue Scotland. However it is understood that data relating to the Scottish Landfill Communities Fund was lost in the attack (although it has been possible to reconstitute some of the data that was lost). The Group focused on supporting SEPA colleagues impacted by the attack.

Further to the information provided above, Revenue Scotland also received two Subject Access Requests (SAR), seven Freedom of Information (FoI) requests, and one Environmental Information Request (EIR). The EIR was later challenged and following a formal review, the initial response was upheld.

Risk Management

I have assessed our risk management arrangements and confirm that they accord with the guidance set out in the SPFM. In addition, as part of the year end Certificates of Assurance process the assessment of risk throughout the year contributes to the overall confidence assessment offered, further confirming that robust arrangements and practices were in operation throughout the year 2020-21.

Parliamentary scrutiny

As a Non-Ministerial Office, Revenue Scotland is accountable to the Scottish Parliament and, as such, can be called to appear before parliamentary committees to provide updates on operational matters, give evidence on tax-related matters or provide written statements.

Revenue Scotland’s Corporate Plan, supporting legislation and this annual report are published documents. The Corporate Plan 2018-21, on which this document reports, was approved by Scottish Ministers and laid before the Scottish Parliament in April 2018, and this report will be laid before Parliament in December 2021.

Corporate Plans, all annual reports and accounts and minutes of the Revenue Scotland Board meetings are available to download on our website.

Internal Audit

The Internal Audit service is provided by the Scottish Government’s Directorate for Internal Audit and Assurance (DIAA). The Audit and Risk Committee reviewed and approved the audit plan produced by DIAA who present regular updates on progress of this plan to the Committee meetings. During the year, DIAA completed audits on the following:

• Governance and Compliance Review
• Review of Operational Changes Made as a Result of COVID-19

In terms of the overall assessment for each audit, “substantial” assurance was awarded to the audit on governance and compliance and to the audit on operational changes made as a result of COVID-19.

A follow-up audit was completed on:

• 2020–21 Cheque and Repayments Processes Review

Progress was made on the implementation of recommendations from this report meaning that controls in this area improved during the year.

Whilst the approved Audit Plan for 2020-21 was not completed fully as a result of COVID-19, the Plan was substantially completed with some advisory audit work being paused.

DIAA’s overall annual assessment of Revenue Scotland’s internal controls is ‘substantial’. This means that DIAA views Revenue Scotland’s risk, governance and control procedures to be effective in supporting the delivery of any related objectives. Any exposure to potential weakness is low and the materiality of any consequent risk is negligible. This indicates an improvement from the ‘reasonable’ assessment received last year. Progress on implementing Internal Audit recommendations has been steady but slower than expected. Most recommendations however, have been implemented during the year. The Audit and Risk Committee views the assessment as a fair reflection of Revenue Scotland’s position based on the evidence reviewed by DIAA.

External Audit

External Audit is provided by Audit Scotland. Mark Taylor, Audit Director is appointed under the Public Finance and Accountability (Scotland) Act 2000 to carry out the external audit of Revenue Scotland. During the year, the Audit and Risk Committee scrutinised Audit Scotland’s audit plan and received regular updates from them. The Independent Auditor’s Report can be found on page 83. As part of the 2019-20 audit undertaken by Audit Scotland of Revenue Scotland, five matters were highlighted for attention; namely:

Audit Scotland has reviewed these during their audit of 2020-21 and reported its conclusions in its Annual Audit Report 2020-21. Audit Scotland reported on internal controls in 2020-21 in its management report to the ARC in May 2021. Work is ongoing to address these recommendations.

Assessment of Corporate Governance

Revenue Scotland has developed a system of internal controls and policies which have been designed to safeguard its assets, data and ensure the reliability of financial records in relation to operational and tax duties. These controls are subject to review by management on a regular basis and undergo formal review by both Internal and External Audit, whose reports are made available to the Audit and Risk Committee.

I have assessed our corporate governance arrangements and confirm that they comply with generally accepted best practice principles and relevant guidance.

Risk Management

I can report that a number of issues arose during the year, and during the period before signing of the Accounts.

Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure continuity of business – the biggest challenge of 2020-21 was the need from March 2020 to respond proactively to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to maintain the successful delivery of our services to taxpayers and their agents. Revenue Scotland rapidly transitioned to a remote working model at this time, where the majority of staff successfully worked from home to deliver those functions that could be performed well in a remote environment. Although decision making had to be largely reactive and responsive due to the exceptional circumstances, Revenue Scotland continued to prioritise staff welfare and wellbeing in every decision made, to sustain delivery of our statutory functions, and to maintain excellent customer services throughout.

Delivering Legislative Change – increased pressure on our resources from legislative change was identified as an issue. A number of legislative changes were successfully delivered however, during 2020-21.

Litigation – in 2020-21, the progress of litigation cases was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the national lockdown periods. Following a brief initial pause, Tribunal and court arrangements were quickly in place to enable electronic lodging of documents, and procedural and full hearings of cases to take place virtually.

Cyber-security – cyber-security continues to be a high priority for Revenue Scotland, as the related risks develop continuously. Revenue Scotland fully complies with the Scottish Government Cyber Essentials Plus framework to maintain continued accreditation. SEPA was the subject of a cyber-attack on 24 December 2020. In response to this, Revenue Scotland set up an incident management group to support SEPA colleagues and ensure continuity of business in the Scottish Landfill Tax function. Regrettably, data relating to the Scottish Landfill Communities Fund (SLCF) was lost in the cyber-attack. This has restricted our ability to report on the SLCF in this report. It was confirmed that some Revenue Scotland data had been lost during the attack, but the assessments indicated that the risks associated with this loss were low. Following a detailed systems check and information security risk assessment, assurance was provided that none of Revenue Scotland’s systems were affected by the cyber-attack. This past year has been incredibly challenging for Revenue Scotland as we responded to the developing health crisis and continued pressure on our resources. However, in spite of these challenges, Revenue Scotland continued to successfully deliver all of our statutory functions and deliver another strong performance against our KPIs and objectives. I am confident that as issues have arisen they have been appropriately dealt with. However, this has had an impact on the resources available for some of the priorities set out at the beginning of the year.

Remuneration

The remuneration of senior civil servants is set in accordance with the rules set out in chapter 7.1, Annex A of the Civil Service Management Code and in conjunction with independent advice from the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB). In reaching its recommendations, the SSRB is to have regard to the following considerations:

• the need to recruit, retain and motivate suitably able and qualified people to exercise their different responsibilities
• regional/local variations in labour markets and their effects on the recruitment and retention of staff
• government policies for improving the public services including the requirement on departments to meet the output targets for the delivery of departmental services
• he funds available to departments as set out in the Government’s departmental expenditure limits
• the Government’s inflation target
• evidence they receive about wider economic considerations and the affordability of their recommendations

Further information about the work of the SSRB can be found at www.ome.uk.com

The remuneration of non-senior civil servants within Revenue Scotland is set in accordance with Scottish Government Public Sector Pay Policy as part of the Scottish Government Main Bargaining Unit.

Revenue Scotland’s Board members and co-opted Committee members are non-executive and receive fees for duties on behalf of Revenue Scotland including attendance at Revenue Scotland Board and Committee meetings. Fees are paid at the daily rate set out in their letters of appointment. Expenses incurred in carrying out these duties are also reimbursed.

Fees of Board members, co-opted Committee members and salaries of the Senior Management Team are shown below:

(1) Simon Cunningham was a co-opted member of ARC prior to becoming a full Board member on 1 January 2021. The fees reported include those due for his time as a co-opted member of ARC

(1) Simon Cunningham was a co-opted member of ARC prior to becoming a full Board member on 1 January 2021. The fees for his time as a co-opted member of ARC for 2020-21 are include within the Board fees.

Non-executive Board members and co-opted Committee members are not employees of Revenue Scotland and do not benefit from pension arrangements.

FYE = Full Year Equivalent

(1); Stephen Crilly moved to a new post outwith Revenue Scotland on 1 December 2019

(2): Neil Ferguson was appointed to the Senior Leadership Team on 6 January 2020

(3): Andrew Fleming moved to a new post outwith Revenue Scotland on 5 January 2020

(4): Mairi Gibson joined Revenue Scotland on 3 February 2020

(5): Chris Myerscough left the Senior Leadership Team on 16 April 2019

(6): Michael Paterson was appointed to the Senior Leadership Team on 8 April 2019



None of the above received any benefits in kind or bonus payments in the year 2020-21 or 2019-20.

Salary covers both pensionable and non-pensionable amounts and includes: gross salaries; overtime; recruitment and retention allowances; or other allowances to the extent that they are subject to UK taxation and any ex-gratia payments. It does not include amounts which are a reimbursement of expenses directly incurred in the performance of an individual’s duties.

The value of pension benefits accrued during the year is calculated as (the real increase in pension multiplied by 20) plus (the real increase in any lump sum) less (the contributions made by the individual). The real increases exclude increases due to inflation or any increase or decreases due to a transfer of pension rights.

Fair Pay Disclosure

Reporting bodies are required to disclose the relationship between the remuneration of the highest-paid director in their organisation and the median remuneration of the organisation’s workforce.

The banded remuneration of the highest-paid member of the Senior Leadership Team in Revenue Scotland in the financial year 2020-21 was £100-105,000 (2019-20: £95-100,000). This was 2.9 times (2019-20: 2.9) the median remuneration of the workforce, which was £35,584 (2019-20: £34,087).

In 2020-21, no employee received remuneration in excess of the highest-paid member of the Senior Leadership team. Remuneration ranged from £23,000 to £101,000 (2019-20: £19,000-£96,000).

The median calculation includes directly employed staff paid through Revenue Scotland’s payroll. It covers both permanent staff and those on fixed term contracts and for 2020-21 it includes temporary agency staff paid locally by invoice. Figures including agency staff are not available for 2019-20 and therefore reflect only permanent and fixed term contract staff. The ratio is calculated as the mid-point of the highest band divided by the median total remuneration.

Pension Benefits

Pension benefits are calculated on normal retirement age (NRA) where the pension entitlement is due at that age or at current age if over NRA.

The above pension data was supplied to Revenue Scotland by MyCSP, pension administrators. 

Civil Service Pensions

Pension benefits are provided through the Civil Service pension arrangements. From 1 April 2015 a new pension scheme for civil servants was introduced – the Civil Servants and Others Pension Scheme or alpha, which provides benefits on a career average basis with a normal pension age equal to the member’s State Pension Age (or 65 if higher). From that date all newly appointed civil servants and the majority of those already in service joined alpha. Prior to that date, civil servants participated in the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS). The PCSPS has four sections: 3 providing benefits on a final salary basis (classic, premium or classic plus) with a normal pension age of 60; and one providing benefits on a whole career basis (nuvos) with a normal pension age of 65.

These statutory arrangements are unfunded with the cost of benefits met by monies voted by Parliament each year. Pensions payable under classic, premium, classic plus, nuvos and alpha are increased annually in line with Pensions Increase legislation. Existing members of the PCSPS who were within 10 years of their normal pension age on 1 April 2012 remained in the PCSPS after 1 April 2015. Those who were between 10 years and 13 years and 5 months from their normal pension age on 1 April 2012 switch into alpha sometime between 1 June 2015 and 1 February 2022. Because the Government plans to remove discrimination identified by the courts in the way that the 2015 pension reforms were introduced for some members, it is expected that, in due course, eligible members with relevant service between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2022 may be entitled to different pension benefits in relation to that period (and this may affect the Cash Equivalent Transfer Values shown in this report – see below). All members who switch to alpha have their PCSPS benefits ‘banked’, with those with earlier benefits in one of the final salary sections of the PCSPS having those benefits based on their final salary when they leave alpha. (The pension figures quoted for officials show pension earned in PCSPS or alpha – as appropriate. Where the official has benefits in both the PCSPS and alpha the figure quoted is the combined value of their benefits in the two schemes.) Members joining from October 2002 may opt for either the appropriate defined benefit arrangement or a defined contribution (money purchase) pension with an employer contribution (partnership pension account).

Employee contributions are salary-related and range between 4.6% and 8.05% for members of classic, premium, classic plus, nuvos and alpha. Benefits in classic accrue at the rate of 1/80th of final pensionable earnings for each year of service. In addition, a lump sum equivalent to three years initial pension is payable on retirement. For premium, benefits accrue at the rate of 1/60th of final pensionable earnings for each year of service. Unlike classic, there is no automatic lump sum. classic plus is essentially a hybrid with benefits for service before 1 October 2002 calculated broadly as per classic and benefits for service from October 2002 worked out as in premium. In nuvos a member builds up a pension based on his pensionable earnings during their period of scheme membership. At the end of the scheme year (31 March) the member’s earned pension account is credited with 2.3% of their pensionable earnings in that scheme year and the accrued pension is uprated in line with Pensions Increase legislation. Benefits in alpha build up in a similar way to nuvos, except that the accrual rate in 2.32%. In all cases members may opt to give up (commute) pension for a lump sum up to the limits set by the Finance Act 2004.

The partnership pension account is an occupational defined contribution pension arrangement which is part of the Legal & General Mastertrust. The employer makes a basic contribution of between 8% and 14.75% (depending on the age of the member). The employee does not have to contribute, but where they do make contributions, the employer will match these up to a limit of 3% of pensionable salary (in addition to the employer’s basic contribution). Employers also contribute a further 0.5% of pensionable salary to cover the cost of centrally-provided risk benefit cover (death in service and ill health retirement).

The accrued pension quoted is the pension the member is entitled to receive when they reach pension age, or immediately on ceasing to be an active member of the scheme if they are already at or over pension age. Pension age is 60 for members of classic, premium and classic plus, 65 for members of nuvos, and the higher of 65 or State Pension Age for members of alpha. (The pension figures quoted for officials show pension earned in PCSPS or alpha – as appropriate. Where the official has benefits in both the PCSPS and alpha the figure quoted is the combined value of their benefits in the two schemes, but note that part of that pension may be payable from different ages.)

Further details about the Civil Service pension arrangements can be found at the website www.civilservicepensionscheme.org.uk

Cash Equivalent

Transfer Values A Cash Equivalent Transfer Value (CETV) is the actuarially assessed capitalised value of the pension scheme benefits accrued by a member at a particular point in time. The benefits valued are the member’s accrued benefits and any contingent spouse’s pension payable from the scheme. A CETV is a payment made by a pension scheme or arrangement to secure pension benefits in another pension scheme or arrangement when the member leaves a scheme and chooses to transfer the benefits accrued in their former scheme. The pension figures shown relate to the benefits that the individual has accrued as a consequence of their total membership of the pension scheme, not just their service in a senior capacity to which disclosure applies.

The figures include the value of any pension benefit in another scheme or arrangement which the member has transferred to the Civil Service pension arrangements. They also include any additional pension benefit accrued to the member as a result of their buying additional pension benefits at their own cost. CETVs are worked out in accordance with The Occupational Pension Schemes (Transfer Values) (Amendment) Regulations 2008 and do not take account of any actual or potential reduction to benefits resulting from Lifetime Allowance Tax which may be due when pension benefits are taken.

Real increase in CETV

This reflects the increase in CETV that is funded by the employer. It does not include the increase in accrued pension due to inflation, contributions paid by the employee (including the value of any benefits transferred from another pension scheme or arrangement) and uses common market valuation factors for the start and end of the period.

Staff report

Staff of Revenue Scotland are civil servants, part of the Scottish Administration, rather than the Scottish Government, and are required to adhere to the standards set out in the Civil Service Code applicable to staff in Non-Ministerial Offices in Scotland. The code sets out the framework within which all civil servants work, and the core values and standards of behaviour which they are expected to uphold.

Staff are appointed by Revenue Scotland and act under the direction of the Board of Revenue Scotland. Revenue Scotland is responsible for ensuring that staff recruitment arrangements are fair, open and transparent in line with the Civil Service Commissioners’ Recruitment Principles. All recruitment, including for Senior Civil Service posts, adhere to the Scottish Government’s recruitment policies and procedures.

Average number of people employed

The average number of full-time equivalent people employed during the year was as follows:

Staff numbers have been allocated as follows:

• administration – this is the general day to day running of Revenue Scotland which includes the costs associated with the collection and administration of tax.
• programme – reflects non-administration costs, this is the cost of implementing processes and systems to comply with new legislation.

The staff numbers shown above include the equivalent of 3 FTE members of staff who were temporarily seconded to Scottish Government working in positions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Costs associated with these secondments were borne by Revenue Scotland and not recharged.

Staff Composition

The average number of people of each sex employed by Revenue Scotland by category is set out in the following table. The numbers include permanent and temporary staff.

*SLT – Senior Leadership Team

Gender Pay Gap

The gender pay gap is calculated as the difference between average hourly earnings of men and women as a proportion of average hourly earnings (excluding overtime) of men’s earnings. A positive pay gap means that men earn more than women on average.

The gender pay gap is a means of highlighting a disparity in the pay received by men and women and is influenced by both the pay levels for equivalent jobs and the distribution of men and women across the grades within the permanent workforce.

In 2021 the gender pay gap for Scotland was 11.5% (2020: 16.9%) and 15.4% (2020: 14.9%)5 for the UK. This is the median figure which is the standard figure used by the Office of National Statistics to calculate the pay gap.

The median gender pay gap for all staff at Revenue Scotland at the end of March 2021 is 17.5% (2020: 8.7%).

This means that the gender pay gap at Revenue Scotland has increased from 2020 and is slightly higher than the UK national pay gap. Substantial recruitment has taken place since the end of the reporting period and it is anticipated that the pay gap will reduce in due course.

Within Revenue Scotland, where men and women are undertaking work of an equal value (i.e. within the same pay range) they are paid a similar rate. The pay gap arises as a higher percentage of female staff are at lower grades than male staff, and the size of the organisation means that figures can be disproportionately affected by a small change in staff composition.

There is still further work required to reduce this gap. Revenue Scotland will continue to monitor the gender pay gap and related data such as the distribution of women and men across different grades and professions within the organisation. The pay gap is reported on within the annual report and every two years in the Revenue Scotland Equalities Mainstreaming Report. This information informs recruitment and retention strategies with a view to reducing the gender pay gap.

Strategies in place include supporting staff to attend the ‘Women in Leadership Conference’ and encouraging staff to attend events run by the Women in Tax Network, requirements for staff involved in recruitment to undertake ‘Unconscious Bias’ training and support for flexible working patterns.

Sickness Absence

Revenue Scotland recognises that the success of any organisation depends largely on the effective performance and full attendance of all its employees. People are a valued resource, and as an employer Revenue Scotland’s attendance management procedures are designed to maintain a happy, well-motivated and healthy workforce. The procedures are aimed to:

• be supportive and positive
• promote fair and consistent treatment for everyone
• encourage, assist and make it easy for people to stay in work
• explain employees’ entitlements and roles and responsibilities

In 2020-21 an average of 8.3 working days per employee were lost (2019-20: 11.5 days).

Staff Turnover

Staff turnover for contracted staff for the year ended March 2021 was 21.8% compared to 21.6% for the year ended March 2020. Approximately 50% of leavers during the year transferred to support business critical roles within Scottish Government arising from their response to the pandemic. A further 8% retired from the Civil Service.

Staff Engagement

Revenue Scotland participates in the Civil Service People Survey and includes the employee engagement index as one of the Key Performance Indicators. More information on this is given on page 38 under KPI7.

Employees with disabilities

Revenue Scotland complies with the Scottish Government’s Civil Service Code of Practice on the employment of people with disabilities. The code aims to ensure that there is no discrimination on the grounds of disability and that employment opportunities and career advancement is based solely on ability, qualifications and suitability for the work.

Diversity and equality

Equality and diversity are central to the way that Revenue Scotland conducts its business and this is demonstrated in the Corporate Plan and People Strategy, as well as being set out in the Equality Mainstreaming Reports, more information about Equality and Diversity can be found on page 48.

Health and Safety

A review of the health and safety policy was begun in 2019-20 and the revised policy finalised in 2020-21 and approved by the Board in October 2020. The new policy brings Health and Safety and Wellbeing closer together and recognising the importance of mental health.

The Health and Safety Annual Report 2020-21 sets out plans for the coming year and reports on risks and mitigations during the reporting year. A refreshed Health, Safety and Wellbeing Committee meets on a quarterly basis to support the delivery of the organisation’s policy and improvement plans, providing oversight and scrutiny of reported information.

The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 (RIDDOR) require that certain categories of accidents, occupational diseases and dangerous occurrences must be reported to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). There were no incidents of any category reported in 2020-21.

Definitions for ‘Occupational Disease’ and ‘Dangerous Occurrence’ can be found on HSE Website.

* We supress all data below 10 to protect staff confidentiality.

Trade Union Representatives

The Trade Union (Facility Time Publication Requirements) Regulations came into force on 1 April 2017. One employee of Revenue Scotland was a relevant trade union official during the period April to July 2019. The time spent on trade union activities represented 5.9% of the employee’s total time during that period at a cost of £1,055. No staff were union representatives in 2020-21.

Civil Service early departure compensation schemes

Redundancy and other departure costs are paid in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Service Compensation Scheme, a statutory scheme made under the Superannuation Act 1972. These are employer costs associated with early departure and are accounted for in full in the year of departure. Where Revenue Scotland has agreed early retirements, the additional costs are met by Revenue Scotland and not the Civil Service pension scheme. Ill-health retirement costs are met by the pension scheme and are not included in the undernoted. No members of staff left Revenue Scotland under the scheme in 2020-21 or 2019-20.

Staff costs for Revenue Scotland in the period 2020-21 are set out above. Wages and salaries include gross salaries, performance pay or bonuses received in year (of which there were none), overtime and any other allowance that is subject to UK taxation.

The payment of legitimate expenses is not part of salary. The costs of staff who have been working on the development of the new tax system have been capitalised as part of the cost of the asset.

Staff costs shown above include costs borne by Revenue Scotland on staff seconded to Scottish Government to work on COVID-19 pandemic related posts. These costs total £136,000.

Revenue Scotland employees are civil servants who are entitled to be members of the Civil Servants and Others Pension Scheme or the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme. These schemes are unfunded, multi-employer defined benefit schemes in which Revenue Scotland is unable to identify its share of the underlying assets and liabilities. The schemes are accounted for as defined contribution schemes under the multiemployer exemption permitted in IAS 19 Employee Benefits. A full actuarial valuation of the PCSPS was carried out as at 31 March 2016. Details can be found in the resource accounts of the Cabinet Office: Civil Superannuation (www.civilservicepensionscheme.org.uk).

For 2020-21, Revenue Scotland’s contributions of £717,000 (2019-20: £744,000) were payable to the two schemes at one of four rates in the range 26.6 per cent to 30.3 per cent of pensionable pay, based on salary bands. The scheme actuary reviews employer contributions every four years following a full scheme valuation. The contribution rates are set to meet the cost of the benefits accruing during 2020-21 to be paid when the member retires, and not the benefits paid during this period to existing pensioners.

Employees can opt to open a partnership pension account or a stakeholder pension with an employer contribution. Employer contributions of £5,000 (2019-20: £6,000) were paid to an appointed stakeholder pension provider. Employer contributions are age-related and range from 3% to 12.5% of pensionable earnings up to 30 September 2015 and from 8% to 14.75% of pensionable earnings from 1 October 2015. Employers also match employee contributions up to 3% of pensionable earnings.

The information included within the remuneration, pension benefits, Civil Service early departure compensation packages, average number of persons employed and staff costs sections above are covered by the audit opinion.

Elaine Lorimer – Chief Executive of Revenue Scotland and Accountable Officer